National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations

Glänzel, Wolfgang·2001·Scientometrics

DOI 10.1023/a:1010512628145

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1010512628145

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 · Cited by 16,064
How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures
Eck, N. J. V., & Waltman, L. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21075 · Cited by 966
The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration
Ponds, R., Van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007) · Papers in Regional Science · doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x · Cited by 645
Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900
Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R., & Tsou, A. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23266 · Cited by 484
What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: changing national patterns in global contexts
Kwiek, M. (2021) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1749254 · Cited by 241
Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University’s publications
Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0343-8 · Cited by 221
The relationship between the research performance of scientists and their position in co-authorship networks in three fields
Bordons, M., Aparicio, J., González-Albo, B., & Díaz-Faes, A. A. (2015) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.001 · Cited by 131
How collaboration type, publication place, funding and author’s role affect citations received by publications from Africa: A bibliometric study of LIS research from 1996 to 2015
Asubiaro, T. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03157-1 · Cited by 76
The relationship between research performance and international collaboration in chemistry
Kato, M., & Ando, A. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1011-y · Cited by 75
International publication trends and collaboration performance of China in healthcare science and services research
Chen, K., Yao, Q., Sun, J., He, Z.-F., Yao, L., & Liu, Z.-Y. (2016) · Israel Journal of Health Policy Research · doi:10.1186/s13584-016-0061-z · Cited by 41
Collaboration with countries with rapidly growing research: supporting proactive development of international research collaboration
Pohl, H. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03287-6 · Cited by 30
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS IN DENTAL JOURNALS ON CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS
Jiang, C. M., Lee, G. H. M., Lo, E. C. M., Chu, C. H., & Wong, M. C. M. (2021) · Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101621 · Cited by 10

Authors: Glänzel, W.
Venue: Scientometrics
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2001-04
Volume: 51
Issue: 1
Pages: 69-115
ISSN: 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
1588-2861
DOI: 10.1023/a:1010512628145
OpenAlex: W1799889357
Cited by: 713
References: 0
FWCI: 12.97
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review