CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 246Social Capital and NetworksSocial Power and Status DynamicsNonprofit Sector and Volunteering

Trusting and Joining? An Empirical Test of the Reciprocal Nature of Social Capital

Claibourn, Michele P., Martin, Paul S.·2000·Political Behavior
DOI 10.1023/a:1010688913148
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1010688913148

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 246

Authors
Claibourn, M. P., & Martin, P. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
Corresponding author
Martin, Paul S.
ORCID
Claibourn, Michele P.
Venue
Political Behavior
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2000-12
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
267-291
ISSN
  • 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6687
DOI
10.1023/a:1010688913148
OpenAlex
W1493174140
Cited by
246
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Keywords
social capital, generalized trust, reciprocal effects, interpersonal trust, group belonging, socialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review