Cited by 160Plant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant Parasitism and ResistancePlant nutrient uptake and metabolism

Long-distance signalling and a mutational analysis of branching in pea

Beveridge, Christine A.·2000·Plant Growth Regulation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1010718020095

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 160

Authors
Beveridge, C. A.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Beveridge, Christine A.
Venue
Plant Growth Regulation
Published
2000-11
Volume
32
Issue
2-3
Pages
193-203
ISSN
  • 0167-6903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5087
OpenAlex
W1507781152
Cited by
160
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Plant Growth Regulation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Keywords
branching, long-distance signaling, auxin transport, auxin response, bud outgrowth, decapitation, Pisum sativum, pea, rootstock

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review