Cited by 124Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Development of a Stress Survey Schedule for Persons with Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities

Groden, June, Diller, Amy, Bausman, Margaret, Velicer, Wayne, Norman, Gregory, Cautela, Joseph·2001·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

The Stress Survey Schedule is an instrument for measuring stress in the lives of persons with autism and other developmental disabilities. Development of the survey and analysis of the underlying measurement structure of the instrument is reported in three studies. Through the use of exploratory and confirmatory analysis procedures, eight dimensions of stress were identified: Anticipation/Uncertainty, Changes and Threats, Unpleasant Events, Pleasant Events, Sensory/Personal Contact, Food Related Activity, Social/Environmental Interactions, and Ritual Related Stress. These stress dimensions are highly relevant to the problems of autism and have not been addressed by other stress surveys. The information obtained from the Stress Survey can be used to plan for strategies to reduce the stress before it occurs or results in maladaptive behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1010755300436

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many individuals with hidden disabilities experience severe difficulties with heightened noises and/or crowded situations within environments.

    “experience severe difficulties with heightened noises and/or crowded situations within environments (Groden et al., 2001, Madriaga, 2010).”

    From iSenseVR: bringing VR exposure therapy outside the laboratory (2019) · cites this paper as Groden et al., 2001

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 33 · Cited by 124

Authors
Groden, J., Diller, A., Bausman, M., Velicer, W., Norman, G., & Cautela, J.
Affiliations
  • Groden Network (US)
  • University of Rhode Island (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2001-04
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
207-217
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W80094600
Cited by
124
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
stress measurement, autism spectrum disorder, developmental disabilities, stress dimensions, social stress, maladaptive behavior, stress reduction strategies
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review