The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory And Women's Development
Gilligan, & Carol, C. (1982) · Cited by 10,869
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,141
A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance
Steele, C. M. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.6.613 · Cited by 6,770
Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet
Turkle, S. (1997) · Cited by 6,329
The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472 · Cited by 5,173
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis.
Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.233 · Cited by 2,749
You just don't understand : women and men in conversation
Tannen, D. (1992) · Cited by 2,589
(1982) · Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College) · Cited by 2,425
Cited by
The digital divide shifts to differences in usage
van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2014) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444813487959 · Cited by 1,733
Whose space? differences among users and non-users of social network sites
Hargittai, E. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00396.x · Cited by 1,286
Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube?
Khan, M. L. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024 · Cited by 1,180
Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender*
Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x · Cited by 734
Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis
Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003 · Cited by 728
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N.
- Venue
- Sex Roles
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 363-379
- ISSN
- 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2762
- OpenAlex
- W2168181594
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 49.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1010937901821
- The paper
- Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1010937901821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
