Dimensions of Anxiety Sensitivity and Their Relationship to Nonclinical Panic
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AS is associated with various anxiety disorder symptoms among younger adults.
“Researchers have highlighted the connection between AS and various anxiety disorder symptoms among younger adults.”
From Anxiety Sensitivity, Experiential Avoidance, and Mindfulness Among Younger and Older Adults: Age Differences in Risk Factors for Anxiety Symptoms (2015) · cites this paper as Deacon and Valentiner (2001)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Deacon, B. J., & Valentiner, D. P.
- Affiliations
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Valentiner, David P.
- Venue
- Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-33
- ISSN
- 0164-0305 (ISSN-L)
- 0882-2689
- 1573-3505
- OpenAlex
- W1533088003
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- anxiety sensitivity, Anxiety Sensitivity Index, factor structure, panic attacks, cognitive concerns, physical concerns, psychometric validation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
