Model Checking of Safety Properties
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For specifications in LTL, it is known how to check if it is a safety language and how to compute a safety automaton that represents it.
“For specifications in LTL, it is known how to check if it is a safety language and how to compute a safety automaton that represents it (Kupferman and Vardi 2001).”
From Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding (2018) · cites this paper as Kupferman and Vardi 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding
Alshiekh, M., Bloem, R., Ehlers, R., Könighofer, B., Niekum, S., & Topcu, U. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11797 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kupferman, O., & Vardi, M. Y.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Rice University (US)
- Venue
- Formal Methods in System Design
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-314
- ISSN
- 0925-9856 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8102
- OpenAlex
- W1540883472
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Formal Methods in System Design (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Formal Methods in Verification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Petri Nets in System Modeling
- Keywords
- model checking, safety properties, linear temporal logic, automata, Tableau, state space exploration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
