Altered Tissue Distribution and Elimination of Amikacin Encapsulated in Unilamellar, Low-Clearance Liposomes (MiKasome®)
Abstract
Purpose Amikacin in small unilamellar liposomes (MiKasome) has prolonged plasma residence (half-life > 24hr) and sustained efficacy in Gram-negative infection models. Since low-clearance liposomes may be subject to a lower rate of phagocytic uptake, we hypothesized this formulation may enhance amikacin distribution to tissues outside the mononuclear phagocyte system.Methods Rats received one intravenous dose (50 mg/kg) of conventional or liposomal amikacin. Amikacin was measured for ten days in plasma, twelve tissues, urine and bile.Results Liposomal amikacin increased and prolonged drug exposure in all tissues. Tissue half-lives (63-465 hr) exceeded the plasma half-life (24.5 hr). Peak levels occurred within 4 hours in some tissues, but were delayed 1-3 days in spleen, liver, lungs and duodenum, demonstrating the importance of characterizing the entire tissue concentration vs. time profile for liposomal drugs. Predicted steady-state tissue concentrations for twice weekly dosing were >100 microg/g. Less than half the liposomal amikacin was recovered in tissues and excreta, suggesting metabolism occurred. Amikacin was not detected in plasma ultrafiltrates. Tissue-plasma partition coefficients (0.2-0.8 in most tissues) estimated from tissue-plasma ratios at Tmax were similar to those estimated from tissue AUCs.Conclusions Low-clearance liposomal amikacin increased and prolonged drug residence in all tissues compared to conventional amikacin. The long tissue half-lives suggest liposomal amikacin is sequestered within tissues, and that an extended dosing interval is appropriate for chronic or prophylactic therapy with this formulation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a rat model, intravenously administered MiKasomes distributed to several tissues, where they released drug gradually resulting in an eightfold increase in drug half-life.
“In a rat model, intravenously administered Mikasomes distributed to several tissues, where they released drug gradually resulting in an eightfold increase in drug half-life.”
From Nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Fielding, R. M., Lewis, R. O., & Moon-McDermott, L.
- Corresponding author
- Fielding, Robert M.
- ORCID
- Fielding, Robert M.
- Venue
- Pharmaceutical Research
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1775-1781
- ISSN
- 0724-8741 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-904X
- OpenAlex
- W2191567995
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Pharmaceutical Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Keywords
- amikacin, liposomal amikacin, unilamellar liposomes, tissue distribution, drug elimination, phagocytic uptake, extended dosing interval, aminoglycosides, gram-negative bacterial infection
- MeSH terms
- Amikacin, Animals, Drug Carriers, Liposomes, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Tissue Distribution, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review