Cited by 354Child Nutrition and Feeding IssuesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchEating Disorders and Behaviors

An assessment of food acceptance in children with autism or pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified

Ahearn, William H., Castine, Todd, Nault, Karen, Green, Gina·2001·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Some children with autism and pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS) have been reported to have atypical feeding behavior, such as sensitivity to food texture and selective preferences for particular foods. No systematic studies of feeding behavior in this population have been published. Munk and Repp (1994) developed methods for assessing feeding problems in individuals with cognitive and physical disabilities that allow categorization of individual feeding patterns based on responses to repeated presentations of food. In this study, we systematically replicated the Munk and Repp procedures with children with autism and PDD-NOS. Thirty children, ages 3 to 14 years, were exposed to 12 food items across 6 sessions. Food acceptance, food expulsion, and disruptive behavior were recorded on a trial-by-trial basis. Approximately half of the participants exhibited patterns of food acceptance, indicating selectivity by food category or food texture. Others consistently accepted or rejected items across food categories. Whether these patterns of food acceptance are atypical remains to be determined by comparison with the feeding patterns of typically developing children and other children with developmental delays.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1012221026124

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Food selectivity in children with ASD is often manifested as a preference for carbohydrates and processed foods.

    “Food selectivity in this population is often manifested as a preference for carbohydrates and processed foods 89.”

    From Gastrointestinal Issues and Autism Spectrum Disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [8]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 354

Authors
Ahearn, W. H., Castine, T., Nault, K., & Green, G.
Affiliations
  • New England Center for Children (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Ahearn, William H.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2001-10
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
505-511
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W1497656781
Cited by
354
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
food acceptance, autism spectrum disorder, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, feeding behavior, picky eating, food refusal, disruptive behavior, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child Behavior, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Food Preferences, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review