Cognitive content-specificity for anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Support for the hypothesized mediators of change in CBT is weak.
“Support for the hypothesized mediators of change in CBT is weak”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes (2006) · cites this paper as Beck & Perkins, 2001
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 42 · Cited by 171
- Authors
- Beck, R., & Perkins, T. S.
- Affiliations
- Abilene Christian University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beck, Richard
- Venue
- Cognitive Therapy and Research
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 651-663
- ISSN
- 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2819
- OpenAlex
- W1549861563
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
- Keywords
- anxiety, depression, cognitive content
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
