Priority Issues in Latino Mental Health Services Research
Abstract
This paper identifies issues and trends affecting the quality and comprehensiveness of Latino mental health research and services. These issues include current patterns of need and services use, rapid expansion of the Latino population, extraordinary rates of uninsured, social and language barriers to care, transformation in treatment science and technology, and the sheer complexity and rapid changes in the delivery system. Progress in the field requires coordination and investments from both public and private sectors. Scientific journals should provide assistance for creating a high quality knowledge base and rapidly disseminating this information to students, practitioners, and policy makers. Vigorous activity is needed to (1) augment the supply of people entering the "pipeline" for researcher and practitioner training, and (2) support research in priority areas such as outcome studies for diverse treatments and different sectors of care, cultural competence, treatment models for youth and aging populations, quality of care, and barriers to mental health care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hispanic persons frequently seek mental health services from primary care settings compared to other resources.
“evidence suggests that Hispanic persons frequently seek mental health services from primary care settings compared to other resources (Bridges et al., 2012; Vega & Lopez, 2001).”
From Perceived Discrimination, Experiential Avoidance, and Mental Health among Hispanic Adults in Primary Care (2022) · cites this paper as Vega & Lopez, 2001
Primary care medical settings are the most common service domain for Latinos to seek healthcare.
“Primary care medical settings are the most common service domain for Latinos to seek healthcare.”
From Mindful attention moderating the effect of experiential avoidance in terms of mental health among Latinos in a federally qualified health center (2018) · cites this paper as Vega and Lopez, 2001
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 79 · Cited by 225
- Authors
- Vega, W. A., & Lopez, S. R.
- Corresponding author
- Vega, William A.
- Venue
- Mental Health Services Research
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 189-200
- ISSN
- 1522-3434 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6636
- OpenAlex
- W1562698495
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Keywords
- Latino mental health, uninsured population, language barriers, cultural competence, barriers to mental health care, youth mental health, geriatric mental health, quality of care, mental health workforce training, research dissemination
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Culture, Health Priorities, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Research, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Mental Health Services, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Quality of Health Care, United States, Needs Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review