CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 47Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentOrganic Food and AgricultureSocial Movements and Cultural Identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conviction seeking efficacy: Sustainable agriculture and the politics of co-optation

Campbell, David·2001·Agriculture and Human Values
DOI 10.1023/a:1015210215751
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1015210215751

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Broome, J. and B. Liebhardt (1997). "Agricultural partnerships in California." Sustainable Agriculture 9(3): 1–4.
  2. Dlott, J., T. Nelson, R. Bugg, M. Spezia, R. Eck, J. Redmond, J. Klein, and L. Lewis (1996). "California, USA: Merced County BIOS project." In L. A. Thrupp (ed.), New Partnerships For Sustainable Agriculture. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  3. Flacks, R. (1981). "Populism in search of the people." Working Papers 8(1): 26–35.
  4. Gorz, A. (1967). A Strategy for Labor. Boston: Beacon Press.
  5. Schaefer, K. S. (ed.) (1997). Learning from the BIOS Approach: A Guide for Community-Based Biological Farming Programs. Davis, California: Community Alliance with Family Farmers; Washington, DC:World Resources Institute.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 47

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Campbell, D.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Campbell, David
ORCID
Campbell, David
Venue
Agriculture and Human Values
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2001-12
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
353-363
ISSN
  • 0889-048X (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8366
DOI
10.1023/a:1015210215751
OpenAlex
W1552478333
Cited by
45
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
14.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Agriculture and Human Values (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
Keywords
sustainable agriculture, political co-optation, movement politics, political credibility, organizational strategy, movement leadership, alliance building, social movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review