CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 422Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentScience Education and PedagogyEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical Thinking and Science Education

Bailin, Sharon·2002·Science & Education
DOI 10.1023/a:1016042608621
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1016042608621

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Anderson, J.R.: 1980, Cognitive Psychology and Its Development, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
  2. Black, M.: 1952, Critical Thinking, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  3. Case, R.: 1980, 'Intellectual Development and Instruction: A Neo-Piagetian View', in A.E. Lawson (ed.), The Psychology of Teaching for Thinking and Creativity, AETS Yearbook, ERIC/SMEAC, Columbus, OH.
  4. Crow, L.W. (ed.): 1989a, Enhancing Critical Thinking in the Sciences, NSTA, Washington, DC.
  5. Dewey, J.: 1916, 'Method in Science', Science Education 1(1), 3-9.
  6. Ennis, R.: 1985, Goals for a Critical Thinking/Reasoning Curriculum, Illinois Critical Thinking Project, Champaign, IL.
  7. Halpern, D.F.: 1992, 'A Cognitive Approach to Improving Thinking Skills in the Sciences and Mathematics', in D.F. Halpern (ed.), Enhancing Thinking Skills in the Sciences and Mathematics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1-14.
  8. Kleinsmith, L.: 1989, 'Critical Thinking about the Biology of Cancer', in L.W. Crow (ed.), Enhancing Critical Thinking in the Sciences, NSTA, Washington, DC, pp. 49-58.
  9. McDiarmid, T., Manzo, R., & Muselle, T.: 1996, Critical Challenges for Primary Students, The Critical Thinking Cooperative, Vancouver.
  10. Mestre, J.P., Dufresne, R.J., Gerace, W.J., Hardiman, P.T., & Tougher, J.S.: 1992, 'Enhancing Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Physics', in D.F. Halpern (ed.), Enhancing Thinking Skills in the Sciences and Mathematics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 77-94.
  11. Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B.: 1958, Growth of Logical Thinking, Basic Books, New York.
  12. Smith, F.: 1990, To Think, Teachers College Press, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 422

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bailin, S.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bailin, Sharon
ORCID
Bailin, Sharon
Venue
Science & Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-07
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
361-375
ISSN
  • 0926-7220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1901
DOI
10.1023/a:1016042608621
OpenAlex
W1639573852
Cited by
404
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Science & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
critical thinking, philosophy of education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review