Cited by 65Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsDiptera species taxonomy and behavior

About the origin of retroviruses and the co-evolution of the gypsy retrovirus with the Drosophila flamenco host gene

Pélisson, A., Teysset, L., Chalvet, F., Kim, A., Prud'homme, N., Terzian, C., Bucheton, A.·1997·Genetica

Abstract

The gypsy element of Drosophila melanogaster is the first retrovirus identified so far in invertebrates. According to phylogenetic data, gypsy belongs to the same group as the Ty3 class of LTR-retrotransposons, which suggests that retroviruses evolved from this kind of retroelements before the radiation of vertebrates. There are other invertebrate retroelements that are also likely to be endogenous retroviruses because they share with gypsy some structural and functional retroviral-like characteristics. Gypsy is controlled by a Drosophila gene called flamenco, the restrictive alleles of which maintain the retrovirus in a repressed state. In permissive strains, functional gypsy elements transpose at high frequency and produce infective particles. Defective gypsy proviruses located in pericentromeric heterochromatin of all strains seem to be very old components of the genome of Drosophila melanogaster, which indicates that gypsy invaded this species, or an ancestor, a long time ago. At that time, Drosophila melanogaster presumably contained permissive alleles of the flamenco gene. One can imagine that the species survived to the increase of genetic load caused by the retroviral invasion because restrictive alleles of flamenco were selected. The characterization of a retrovirus in Drosophila, one of the most advanced model organisms for molecular genetics, provides us with an exceptional clue to study how a species can resist a retroviral invasion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1018336303298

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pélisson, A., Teysset, L., Chalvet, F., Kim, A., Prud'homme, N., Terzian, C., & Bucheton, A.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Genetica
Published
1997-03
Volume
100
Issue
1-3
Pages
29-37
ISSN
  • 0016-6707 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6857
OpenAlex
W1540751634
Cited by
65
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Genetica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
Keywords
Drosophila melanogaster, endogenous retroviruses, LTR retrotransposons, Ty3 retrotransposon, retroviral restriction, pericentromeric heterochromatin, provirus, host-virus coevolution, genetic load
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila, Polymorphism, Genetic, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Retroviridae, Genome, Genes, Insect, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review