Cited by 11Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsDental Implant Techniques and OutcomesOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

An animal study on the bone behaviour of Ca–P-coated implants: influence of implant location

CAULIER, H, HAYAKAWA, T, NAERT, I, VAN DER WAERDEN, J. P. C. M, WOLKE, J. G. C, JANSEN, J. A·1997·Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Abstract

Four different implant materials were installed into the mandibular corner of goats to investigate the trabecular bone response in a mainly unloaded model. The implants were installed using a standardized technique and were left in situ for 12 weeks. One goat had to be sacrificed after surgery because of a broken rib; the other animals healed uneventfully. After sacrifice of the animals, the bone response to the uncoated and the three different Ca-P implants was evaluated histologically and histomorphometrically. Four sections of each implant were evaluated; two were located in the cortical and two in the trabecular bone. Of the 44 retrieved implants, 20 implants appeared to be installed partially in the mandibular canal, as clearly visible on the X-rays. These implants were not used in the histomorphometrical measurements. Histological evaluation showed that the trabecular and cortical bone reactions were similar; there was no significant difference in the percentage of bone contact nor in the amount of bone in contact with the implants. In conclusion this study showed that the mandibular corner is an unsatisfactory model for the installation of implants because of anatomical restrictions. Also, the experiment remained inconclusive about the influence of loading conditions on bone behaviour. Nevertheless, the histological results confirmed the bioactive properties of Ca-P coatings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1018542630017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CAULIER, H., HAYAKAWA, T., NAERT, I., VAN DER WAERDEN, J. P. C. M., WOLKE, J. G. C., & JANSEN, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Nihon University (JP)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
Published
1997-09
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
531-536
ISSN
  • 0957-4530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4838
OpenAlex
W1742450986
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Keywords
calcium phosphate coatings, bioactive implants, implantation site, mandibular canal, bone-implant contact, bone regeneration, goat model, unloading, histomorphometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review