The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 · Cited by 29,767
Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078 · Cited by 16,729
The Measurement of Productive Efficiency
Farrell, M. J. (1957) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2343100 · Cited by 16,038
Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1979) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(79)90229-7 · Cited by 3,300
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., & Stutz, J. (1985) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(85)90133-2 · Cited by 1,716
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1981) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.27.6.668 · Cited by 1,546
Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Huang, Z. M., & Sun, D. B. (1990) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90048-x · Cited by 722
The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming
Thompson, R. G., Langemeier, L. N., Lee, C.-T., Lee, E., & Thrall, R. M. (1990) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90049-y · Cited by 715
Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas
Thompson, R. G., Singleton, F. D., Thrall, R. M., & Smith, B. A. (1986) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.16.6.35 · Cited by 675
Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis
Dyson, R. G., & Thanassoulis, E. (1988) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1988.96 · Cited by 605
Self-citation
Cited by
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9 · Cited by 1,325
A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators
Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.020 · Cited by 325
Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Van Puyenbroeck, T., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Liska, R., & Tarantola, S. (2008) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602445 · Cited by 322
Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: PCA–DEA or variable reduction
Adler, N., & Yazhemsky, E. (2010) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.050 · Cited by 229
A common weight MCDA–DEA approach to construct composite indicators
Hatefi, S. M., & Torabi, S. A. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.08.014 · Cited by 213
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, R., Athanassopoulos, A., Dyson, R. G., & Thanassoulis, E.
- Venue
- Annals of Operations Research
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 13-34
- ISSN
- 0254-5330 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9338
- OpenAlex
- W1536231159
- Cited by
- 688
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 14.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1018968909638
- The paper
- Allen, R., Athanassopoulos, A., Dyson, R. G., & Thanassoulis, E. (1997). Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1018968909638
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
