CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 131Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ADHD Outside the Laboratory: Boys' Executive Function Performance on Tasks in Videogame Play and on a Visit to the Zoo

Lawrence, Vivienne, Houghton, Stephen, Tannock, Rosemary, Douglas, Graham, Durkin, Kevin, Whiting, Ken·2002·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
DOI 10.1023/a:1019812829706
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

One current theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) proposes that a primary deficit in behavioral inhibition gives rise to secondary deficits in 4 executive functions and motor control. To date, empirical support for this model is based primarily on laboratory-based cognitive methods. This study assessed behavioral inhibition and executive functioning in children with ADHD in 2 real-life contexts: videogames (motor-skill target game, cognitively demanding adventure game) and an outing at the zoo (route tasks). Participants were a community sample of 57 boys diagnosed with ADHD (20 inattentive, 37 combined type) and 57 normally developing control boys, matched individually for age and nonverbal IQ. Operationally defined measures of behavioral inhibition and specific executive functions were derived from these activities and assessed under contrasting conditions of low or high working memory and distractor loads. There were no group differences in basic motor skills on the target game, nor in terms of the ability to inhibit a prepotent or ongoing response in the adventure videogame. However, boys with ADHD exhibited more self-talk, more effortful response preparation, and completed fewer challenges in the latter videogame. Also, they manifested inhibition deficits in terms of interference control during the route task at the zoo and took longer to complete the tasks. Typically, these differences were greatest under conditions of high working memory and distractor loads. Findings from this study suggest that cognitive difficulties in ADHD may be context dependent and that ADHD is associated with deficits in some but not all aspects of behavioral inhibition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1019812829706

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  2. Cary, D. (1997). Bart Star (D. Polcino, Director). In Mike Scully (Exec. Producer), The Simpsons. Century City: 20th Century Fox Corporation.
  3. Cupitt, M., & Stockbridge, S. (1996). Families and electronic entertainment. Sydney: Australian Broadcasting Commission and the Office of Film and Literature Classification.
  4. Durkin, K., & Aisbett, K. (1999). Computer games and Australians today. NSW, Australia: Office of Film and Literature Classification.
  5. DuPaul, G. J., Power, T. T., Anastopoulos, A. D., & Reid, R. (1998). ADHD rating scale IV: Checklist, norms & clinical interpretation. New York: The Guilford Press.
  6. Greenfield, P. M. (1999). The cultural evolution. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The rising curve (pp. 81-124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  7. Neale, M. D. (1989). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (2nd Ed.). London: Macmillan.
  8. Tannock, R. (1997). Television, videogames, and ADHD: Challenging a popular belief. The ADHD Report, 5, 3-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–131 of 131

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lawrence, V., Houghton, S., Tannock, R., Douglas, G., Durkin, K., & Whiting, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
Corresponding author
Houghton, Stephen
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-10
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
447-462
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
DOI
10.1023/a:1019812829706
OpenAlex
W330186422
Cited by
131
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, executive function, behavioral inhibition, zoo visits, real-life context, working memory load, distractor load, interference control, self-talk, boys, inattentive subtype, combined type, motor control
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Internal-External Control, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Task Performance and Analysis, Cohort Studies, Video Games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review