The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimation of Causal Effects using Propensity Score Weighting: An Application to Data on Right Heart Catheterization
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2971733 · Cited by 5,486
A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483446 · Cited by 4,293
Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00044 · Cited by 3,807
Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078 · Cited by 3,082
A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280784 · Cited by 3,011
The Effectiveness of Right Heart Catheterization in the Initial Care of Critically III Patients
Connors, A. F. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.276.11.889 · Cited by 2,434
Analysis of Semiparametric Regression Models for Repeated Outcomes in the Presence of Missing Data
Robins, J. M., Rotnitzky, A. G., & Zhao, L. P. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476493 · Cited by 1,597
Subset Selection in Regression
Miller, A. J. (2003) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2003.s144 · Cited by 1,501
Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice.
Rubin, D., & Thomas, N. (1996) · Biometrics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810725.024 · Cited by 1,445
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- P. Rosenbaum, Observational Studies, Springer Verlag, 1985. ESTIMATION OF CAUSAL EFFECTS USING PROPENSITY SCORE WEIGHTING 277
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SOME PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING
Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x · Cited by 6,238
Hainmueller, J. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr025 · Cited by 6,026
Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation
Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.1.5 · Cited by 4,926
Self-citationNonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A Review
Imbens, G. W. (2004) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465304323023651 · Cited by 2,994
Self-citationVariable Selection for Propensity Score Models
Brookhart, M. A., Schneeweiss, S., Rothman, K. J., Glynn, R. J., Avorn, J., & Stürmer, T. (2006) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwj149 · Cited by 2,336
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirano, K., & Imbens, G. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 259-278
- ISSN
- 1387-3741 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9400
- OpenAlex
- W2176874128
- Cited by
- 1,039
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 62
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- causal effect estimation, propensity score weighting, right heart catheterization, regression adjustment, feature selection, estimator stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
