Cited by 84

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methanogenium marinum sp. nov., a H2-using methanogen from Skan Bay, Alaska, and kinetics of H2 utilization

Chong, Song C., Liu, Yitai, Cummins, Michael, Valentine, David L., Boone, David R.·2002·Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

Abstract

A methanogen, strain AK-1, was isolated from permanently cold marine sediments, 38- to 45-cm below the sediment surface at Skan Bay, Alaska. The cells were highly irregular, nonmotile coccoids (diameter, 1 to 1.2 microm), occurring singly. Cells grew by reducing CO2 with H2 or formate as electron donor. Growth on formate was much slower than that on H2. Acetate, methanol, ethanol, 1- or 2-propanol, 1- or 2-butanol and trimethylamine were not catabolized. The cells required acetate, thiamine, riboflavin, a high concentration of vitamin B12, and peptones for growth; yeast extract stimulated growth but was not required. The cells grew fastest at 25 degrees C (range 5 degrees C to 25 degrees C), at a pH of 6.0-6.6 (growth range, pH 5.5-7.5), and at a salinity of 0.25-1.25 M Na+. Cells of this and other H2-using methanogens from saline environments metabolized H2 to a very low threshold pressure (less than 1 Pa) that was dependent on the methane partial pressure. We propose that the threshold pressure may be limited by the energetics of catabolism. The sequence of the 16S rDNA gene of strain AK-1 was most similar (98%) to the sequences of Methanogenium cariaci JR-1 and Methanogeniumfrigidum Ace-2. DNA-DNA hybridization between strain AK-1 and these two strains showed only 34.9% similarity to strain JR-1 and 56.5% similarity to strain Ace-2. These analyses indicated strain AK-1 should be classified as a new species within the genus Methanogenium. Phenotypic differences between stra…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1020535222281

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Alperin MJ & Reeburgh WS (1992) Organic carbon remineralization and preservation in sediments of Skan Bay, Alaska. In: Whelan JK & Farrington JW (Eds) Ogranic Matter Productivity, Accumulation, and Preservation in Recent and Ancient Sediments. Vol. XII, p. 533. Columbia University Press, New York.
  2. Balch WE, Fox GE (1979) Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol. Rev. 43: 260–296. · DOI
  3. Balch WE & Wolfe RS (1976) New approach to the cultivation of methanogenic bacteria: 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid (HSCoM)-dependent growth of Methanobacterium ruminantium in a pressurized atmosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 32: 781–791. · DOI
  4. Boone DR, & Castenholz R (Eds) (1999) Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
  5. Boone DR & Johnson RL (1989) Diffusion of hydrogen to methanogens and effects on measurements of enzyme kinetics. Workshop on Microbiology of Landfills, Beaverton, Oregon.
  6. Boone DR & Whitman WB (1988) Proposal of minimal standards for describing new taxa of methanogenic bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 38: 212–219. · DOI
  7. Cashion P & Holder-Franklin MA (1977) A rapid method for base ratio determination of bacterial DNA. Anal. Biochem. 81: 461–466. · DOI
  8. Conrad R (1999) Contribution of hydrogen to methane production and control of hydrogen concentrations in methanogenic soils and sediments. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 28: 193–202. · DOI
  9. De Ley J & Cattoir H (1970) The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Eur. J. Biochem. 12: 133–142. · DOI
  10. Escara JF & Hutton JR (1980) Thermal stability and renaturation of DNA in dimethylsulphoxide solutions: acceleration of renaturation rate. Biopolymers 19: 1315–1327. · DOI
  11. Franzmann PD & Liu Y (1997) Methanogenium frigidum sp. nov., a psychrophilic, H2-using methanogen from Ace Lake, Antarctica. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47: 1068–1072. · DOI
  12. Hungate RE (1969) A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes. In: Norris JR & Ribbons DW (Eds) Methods in Microbiology Vol 3B (pp 117–132). Academic Press, New York. · DOI
  13. Huss V A R & Festl H (1983) Studies on the spectrometric determination of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. J Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 4: 184–192. · DOI
  14. Jahnke K-D (1992) Basic computer program for evaluation of spectroscopic DNA renaturation data from Gilford System 2600 spectrometer on a PC/XT/AT type personal computer. J. Microbiol. Meth. 15: 61–73. · DOI
  15. Jones WJM & Paynter JB (1983) Characterization of Methanococcus maripaludis sp. nov., a new methanogen isolated from salt marsh sediment. Arch. Microbiol. 135: 91–97. · DOI
  16. Lovley DR & Goodwin S (1988) Hydrogen concentrations as an indicator of the predominant terminal electron-accepting reactions in aquatic sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 52: 2993–3003. · DOI
  17. Maestrojuán GM & Boone DR (1991) Characterization of Methanosarcina barkeri MST and 227, Methanosarcina mazei S-6T, and Methanosarcina vacuolata Z-761T. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41: 267–274. · DOI
  18. Maestrojuán GM, & Boone DR (1990) 'Transfer of Methanogenium bourgense, Methanogenium marisnigri, Methanogenium olentangyi, and Methanogenium thermophilicum to the genus Methanoculleus gen. nov., emendation of Methanoculleus marisnigri, and description of new strains of Methanoculleus bourgense and Methanoculleus marisnigri. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 40: 117–122. · DOI
  19. Munson MA & Nedwell DB (1997) Phylogenetic diversity of Archaea in sediment samples from a coastal salt marsh. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63(12): 4729–4733. · DOI
  20. Powell GE (1983) Interpreting gas kinetics of batch culture. Biotechnol. Lett. 5: 437–440. · DOI
  21. Romesser JA & Wolfe RS (1979) Methanogenium, a new genus of marine methanogenic bacteria, and characterization of Methanogenium cariaci sp. nov. and Methanogenium marisnigri sp. nov. Arch. Microbiol. 121: 147–153. · DOI
  22. Stadtman TC & Barker HA (1951) Studies on the methane fermentation: X. A new formate-decomposing bacterium, Methanococcus vannielii. J. Bacteriol. 62: 269–280. · DOI
  23. Valentine DL & Reeburgh WS (2000) New perspectives on anaerobic methane oxidation. Environ. Microbiol. 2: 477–484. · DOI
  24. Vetriani C, & Jannasch HW (1999) Population structure and phylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea in deep-dea sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65(10): 4375–4384. · DOI
  25. Wayne LG & Brenner DJ (1987) Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37: 463–464. · DOI
  26. Zhang J-Z & Millero FJ (1993) The chemistry of anoxic waters in the Cariaco Trench. Deep-Sea Res. 39: 1023–1041. · DOI
  27. Zwietering MH, & Jongenburger I (1990) Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 1875–1881. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 84

Metadata

Authors
Chong, S. C., Liu, Y., Cummins, M., Valentine, D. L., & Boone, D. R.
Venue
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
Published
2002-12
Volume
81
Issue
1-4
Pages
263-270
ISSN
  • 0003-6072
  • 1572-9699
Cited by
84
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review