CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 69Efficiency Analysis Using DEARenewable energy and sustainable power systemsElectric Power System Optimization

Relative performance of U.S. and Japanese electricity distribution: an application of stochastic frontier analysis

Hattori, Toru·2002·Journal of Productivity Analysis
DOI 10.1023/a:1020695709797
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1020695709797

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The no existence of inefficiency (39%) is rejected to enclose the external factors to avoid bias.

    “The no existence of inefficiency (39%) is rejected to enclose the external factors to avoid bias (Hattori, 2002) (see Appendix1).”

    From Airports’ public infrastructure and sources of inefficiency (2023) · cites this paper as Hattori, 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hattori, T.
Affiliations
Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (JP)
Corresponding author
Hattori, Toru
Venue
Journal of Productivity Analysis
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-11
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
269-284
ISSN
  • 0895-562X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0441
DOI
10.1023/a:1020695709797
OpenAlex
W4231009123
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Productivity Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
Keywords
electricity distribution, electric utilities, technical efficiency, stochastic frontier analysis, investor-owned utilities, cross-national comparison, United States, Japan, environmental variables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review