Modelling of materials policies
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some of the benefits of textile recycling might be counteracted by increased consumption (a 'rebound effect').
“In other words, some of the benefits of textile recycling might be counteracted by increased consumption (a”
From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Gielen and Moriguchi, 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review
Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266 · Cited by 1,087 · see citing works
“The exception is Liang et al. (2012), who study the environmental impact of paper produced from various waste materials and conclude that textile waste is a questionable feedstock compared to other waste materials (for the technological pathways studied).”
Background
- Authors
- Gielen, D. J., & Moriguchi, Y.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
- Venue
- Environmental Modeling & Assessment
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 231-241
- ISSN
- 1420-2026 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2967
- OpenAlex
- W2044572021
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Modeling & Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Keywords
- materials policy, waste management policy, petrochemical industry, policy evaluation, pricing instruments, carbon tax, subsidies, rebound effect, waste streams
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
