The Good Behavior Game: A Best Practice Candidate as a Universal Behavioral Vaccine
Abstract
A "behavioral vaccine" provides an inoculation against morbidity or mortality, impacting physical, mental, or behavior disorders. An historical example of a behavioral vaccine is antiseptic hand washing to reduce childbed fever. In current society, issues with high levels of morbidity, such as substance abuse, delinquency, youth violence, and other behavioral disorders (multiproblems), cry out for a low-cost, widespread strategy as simple as antiseptic hand washing. Congruent research findings from longitudinal studies, twin studies, and other investigations suggest that a possibility might exist for a behavioral vaccine for multiproblem behavior. A simple behavioral strategy called the Good Behavior Game (GBG), which reinforces inhibition in a group context of elementary school, has substantial previous research to consider its use as a behavioral vaccine. The GBG is not a curriculum but rather a simple behavioral procedure from applied behavior analysis. Approximately 20 independent replications of the GBG across different grade levels, different types of students, different settings, and some with long-term follow-up show strong, consistent impact on impulsive, disruptive behaviors of children and teens as well as reductions in substance use or serious antisocial behaviors. The GBG, named as a "best practice" for the prevention of substance abuse or violent behavior by a number of federal agencies, is unique because it is the only practice implemented by individual teacher…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 106 · Cited by 365
- Authors
- Embry, D. D.
- Corresponding author
- Embry, Dennis D.
- ORCID
- Embry, Dennis D.
- Venue
- Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 273-297
- ISSN
- 1096-4037 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2827
- OpenAlex
- W2146475873
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- Good Behavior Game, substance use prevention, antisocial behavior, youth violence, disruptive behavior, inhibition, elementary school, long-term follow-up, cost-effectiveness, best practices
- MeSH terms
- Absenteeism, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Games, Experimental, Health Education, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Peer Group, Public Health, School Health Services, United States, Violence, Health Behavior, Substance-Related Disorders, Benchmarking, Marketing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review