Glycosaminoglycan-lipoprotein interaction
Abstract
Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) bound to various proteoglycans (PGs) present in the cardiovascular system have been proposed to perform a wide range of functions. These include conferring viscoelastic properties; interacting with and modulating growth factors and enzymes; and as receptors and co-receptors in lipoprotein metabolism. Binding of apoB-100 lipoproteins, particularly low density lipoproteins (LDL), to GAGs of extracellular matrix PGs in arteries has been proposed to be an initiating event in development of atherosclerosis. This study was initiated with the aim of getting an overview of the binding patterns of different lipoprotein subclasses with individual GAG categories. We thus evaluated the interaction of lipoproteins with GAGs commonly found in the cardiovascular system using a gel mobility-shift assay developed for this purpose. The same procedure was used to measure lipoproteins binding to metabolically [(35)S]-labeled whole PGs prepared from three cell types, arterial smooth muscle cells, THP-1 macrophages and from HepG2 cells. The effect of GAG composition on PGs on lipoprotein binding was evaluated by enzymatic degradation of the carbohydrate chains. Heparan sulfate was found to bind beta very low density lipoproteins (beta-VLDL) and a chylomicron remnant model (beta-VLDL+apoE), but not LDL. Dermatan sulfate was found to bind LDL, but not beta-VLDL or the chylomicron remnant model. Chondroitin sulfate and heparin were found to bind all lipoproteins tested (LDL, beta-VLDL and beta-VLDL+apoE) although with different affinities. We can conclude that each lipoprotein subclass tested binds a specific assortment of the GAGs tested. The observations made contribute to the understanding of new and complex mechanisms by which carbohydrate and lipid metabolism may be linked.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Variations in the distribution of acidic groups in different types of GAG are likely to influence the interaction with apoE.
“Although the variations in the distribution of acidic groups in different types of GAG (31) are likely to influence the interaction with apoE (32, 33)”
From Role of the N- and C-Terminal Domains in Binding of Apolipoprotein E Isoforms to Heparan Sulfate and Dermatan Sulfate: A Surface Plasmon Resonance Study (2008) · cites this paper as [32]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Olsson, U., Östergren-Lundén, G., & Moses, J.
- Affiliations
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Olsson, Urban
- Venue
- Glycoconjugate Journal
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 789-797
- ISSN
- 0282-0080 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-4986
- OpenAlex
- W1760442572
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Glycoconjugate Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- AstraZeneca
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Magnus Bergvalls Stiftelse
- Socialstyrelsen
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Keywords
- lipoprotein binding, heparan sulfate, dermatan sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, heparin, low-density lipoprotein, beta-VLDL, chylomicron remnants, apolipoprotein E, proteoglycans, atherosclerosis, lipoprotein metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism
- MeSH terms
- Autoradiography, Cardiovascular System, Glycosaminoglycans, Humans, Lipoproteins, Models, Biological, Protein Binding, Recombinant Proteins, Substrate Specificity, Sulfur Radioisotopes, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review