Cited by 39Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Modification and ablation for inappropriate sinus tachycardia: current status

Shen, Win-Kuang·2002·Cardiac Electrophysiology Review

Abstract

Inappropriate sinus tachycardia is an ill-defined clinical syndrome with diverse clinical manifestations. Clinical symptoms can range from intermittent palpitations to multisystem complaints. Although there is a general consensus that when the heartbeat exceeds 100 beats per minute at rest or with minimal physiologic challenge, it is considered "inappropriate," this quantitative differentiation is quite arbitrary, while validation of the reproducibility of the heart rate/activity correlation can be challenging. Once the clinical diagnosis of inappropriate sinus tachycardia is expected, other supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and medical conditions causing sinus tachycardia should be excluded. The underlying mechanism of inappropriate sinus tachycardia is not well understood. "Intracardiac" mechanisms such as enhanced intrinsic automaticity, enhanced sympathetic tone, increased sympathetic receptor sensitivity, and blunted parasympathetic tone have been proposed. Evidences for "extracardiac" mechanisms such as length-dependent autonomic neuropathy, excessive venous pooling, beta-receptor hypersensitivity, alpha-receptor hyposensitivity, altered sympathovagal balance, and brainstem dysregulation have also been reported. Currently, our ability to differentiate primary (intracardiac) from secondary (extracardiac) mechanisms of inappropriate sinus tachycardia is limited. It has been reported that ablative therapy of sinus node is effective in treating patients with symptomatic inappropriate sinus tachycardia. Acute success of sinus node modification/ablation can be accomplished in 70%-100% of the various study populations. Although long-term successful outcome may be accomplished in a few patients, symptoms of palpitations and autonomic characteristics frequently persist. Identification and differentiation of patients who are suitable for ablative therapy versus medical therapy should be one of the central clinical research issues in this patient population. This brief review first considers the clinical and electrophysiologic diagnosis of inappropriate tachycardia and then summarizes the mechanisms of inappropriate sinus tachycardia and related syndromes such as postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Techniques of mapping and ablation of sinus node are discussed briefly. A critical review of the acute and long-term clinical outcomes following sinus node ablation and modification is updated. In conclusion, the precise role of sinus node modification in patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia remains to be determined. Sinus node modification could be considered in patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia with persistently increased heart rate in the absence of any autonomic abnormalities. Autonomic laboratory testing should be performed to exclude any evidence of autonomic dysregulation. Clinical research on the pathophysiology of inappropriate sinus tachycardia should be pursued vigorously.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1021167821190

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Symptoms can persist despite sinus node slowing.

    “symptoms can persist despite sinus node slowing”

    From Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (2019) · cites this paper as [99]

  • Benefits of ablation may be only short term.

    “the benefits may be only short term. 99”

    From Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (2019) · cites this paper as [99]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 39

Authors
Shen, W.-K.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Shen, Win-Kuang
Venue
Cardiac Electrophysiology Review
Published
2002-12
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
349-355
ISSN
  • 1385-2264 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-725X
OpenAlex
W1523245040
Cited by
39
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cardiac Electrophysiology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
inappropriate sinus tachycardia, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, autonomic dysfunction, autonomic neuropathy, sympathovagal balance, electrodiagnosis, long-term outcomes, autonomic function testing
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Postoperative Complications, Prognosis, Recurrence, Severity of Illness Index, Sinoatrial Node, Tachycardia, Sinus, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Risk Assessment, Body Surface Potential Mapping, Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review