Implications of Individual Differences in Subjective Happiness for Perceiving, Interpreting, and Thinking About Life Events
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals who express or report higher levels of positive emotion show more constructive and flexible coping, more abstract and long-term thinking, and greater emotional distance following stressful negative events.
“Individuals who express or report higher levels of positive emotion show more constructive and flexible coping, more abstract and long-term thinking, and greater emotional distance following stressful negative events (Keltner & Bonanno, 1997;Martin, Kuiper, Olinger, & Dance, 1993;Lyubomirsky & Tucker, 1998;Stein, Folkman, Trabasso, & Richards, 1997).”
From The Undoing Effect of Positive Emotions (2000) · cites this paper as Lyubomirsky & Tucker, 1998
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 200
- Authors
- Lyubomirsky, S., & Tucker, K. L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- ORCID
- Lyubomirsky, Sonja
- Venue
- Motivation and Emotion
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-186
- ISSN
- 0146-7239 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6644
- OpenAlex
- W350033497
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 6.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Motivation and Emotion (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- subjective happiness, individual differences, life events, event interpretation, positive thinking, peer nominations, interpersonal liking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
