Effect of heat treatment on the proximate composition, energy values, and levels of some toxicants in African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) seed varieties
Abstract
The effects of heat treatments on the proximate composition, energy content, and levels of some antinutritional factors in brown and marble-colored African yam bean (AYB) seed flours were investigated. In raw brown and marble-colored AYB seed flours; moisture content, dry matter, crude protein, crude fat, ash, total carbohydrate and caloric value did not differ significantly at the 5% level. Autoclaving and cooking slightly increased the moisture level. Crude protein, crude fat, and ash contents were decreased by autoclaving and were further decreased by cooking. The decrease was not, however, considerable for the AYB that is not eaten raw and whose full nutritional potential as a legume can be derived only when heat treated, as previous reports have indicated for legume seeds. The levels of the toxicants were generally higher in the raw brown AYB compared to the marble-colored, and were generally reduced by both autoclaving and cooking. In the most commonly available and consumed marble-colored AYB, autoclaving at 121 degrees C, 15 psi for 20 min decreased cyanogenic glycosides by 46%, oxalate by 48.9%, tannin by 15.0%, saponin by 14.8% and trypsin inhibitors by 61.3% while cooking for 3.5 hours in tap water decreased these toxic factors by 66.5%, 70.3%, 72.2%, 48.7%, and 86.0%, respectively. The results indicate that for raw samples, varietal difference did not significantly affect nutrient composition though the toxicants were generally higher in the brown AYB than the marble-colored. Autoclaving decreased both nutrient value and the level of toxicants in the two seed types; values were further reduced by cooking. Of the toxicants, trypsin inhibitor was found to be the most heat-labile and of the heat treatment methods, cooking to tenderness is recommendable.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Autoclaving may have resulted in either an increase in nutrient bioavailability, reduction or destruction of antibacterial proteins and enzyme products, resulting in the shorter lag time for E. coli in autoclaved coconut water.
“This may therefore imply that autoclaving may have resulted in either an increase in nutrient bioavailability, reduction or the destruction of these proteins and enzyme products resulting in the shorter lag time for E. coli in it.”
From Potential Bacterial Health Risk Posed to Consumers of Fresh Coconut (<i>Cocos nucifera</i> L.) Water (2012) · cites this paper as [15]
Antibacterial peptides and other growth limiting substances in coconut would have a minimal contribution in influencing the growth of K. pneumoniae in contaminated coconut water.
“Although the possible contributions of growth inhibitory antibacterial peptides and other growth limiting substances reported to be present in coconut [3,9,15] cannot be evaluated with the results of this study, it is clear that these would have a minimal contribution in influencing the growth of K. pneumoniae in contaminated coconut water.”
From Potential Bacterial Health Risk Posed to Consumers of Fresh Coconut (<i>Cocos nucifera</i> L.) Water (2012) · cites this paper as [15]
Autoclaving leads to reduction in free amino acids, crude proteins, sugars, and some mineral nutrients in fruit juices and bacteria growth media.
“Autoclaving has been shown to result in the reduction (in amount) of free amino acids (particularly tyrosine, phenalanine, cyteine, lysine and methionine), crude proteins, sugars and some mineral nutrients (Mg +2 , 4 , Na + , K + , and Ca +2 ) in fruit juices and bacteria growth media [15][16][17].”
From Potential Bacterial Health Risk Posed to Consumers of Fresh Coconut (<i>Cocos nucifera</i> L.) Water (2012) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Onyeike, E. N., & Omubo-Dede, T. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Port Harcourt (NG)
- Venue
- Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 223-231
- ISSN
- 0033-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 0921-9668
- 1573-9104
- OpenAlex
- W2033375498
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Plant Foods for Human Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Cassava research and cyanide
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Keywords
- African yam bean, Sphenostylis stenocarpa, heat treatment (food and biological processing), autoclaving, cooking, antinutritional factors, cyanogenic glycosides, oxalate, tannins, saponins, trypsin inhibitor, proximate composition, energy content, seed flour, cultivar differences, legume nutrition
- MeSH terms
- alpha-Amylases, Carbohydrates, Cooking, Digestion, Food Analysis, Glycosides, Hot Temperature, Humans, Nutritive Value, Oxalates, Plant Oils, Plant Proteins, Plants, Medicinal, Saponins, Seeds, Time Factors, Trypsin Inhibitors, Sphenostylis, Hydrolyzable Tannins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review