CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 229Heavy metals in environmentEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry StudiesMine drainage and remediation techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using municipal biosolids in combination with other residuals to restore metal-contaminated mining areas.

Brown, Sally L., Henry, Charles L., Chaney, Rufus, Compton, Harry, DeVolder, Pam S.·2003·Plant and Soil
DOI 10.1023/a:1022558013310
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1022558013310

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Christiansen B and Brown S 2001 Assessment of methods for in situ remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. In Proc. 6th International Conference on the Biogeochemistry of Trace Elements. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada 29 July – 2 August. p. 36.
  2. Li R S and Daniels W L 1997 Reclamation of coal refuse with a peppermill sludge amendment. In Proc. 1997 Natl. Meet. Am. Soc. Surf. Mining and Reclam. Austin, TX 10–15 May. Eds. J E Brandt et al. pp. 277–290. ASSMR, Princeton, WV.
  3. Li Z, Ryan J A, and Chen J L 2000 Cadmium adsorption on iron oxides, humic substances, and sewage sludge. American Chemical Society. Division of Environmental Chemistry. Preprints of extended abstracts. 40, 8–9
  4. SAS Institute 1990 SAS User's Guide: Statistics. 4th edn. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
  5. Silverman J 2001 IT Corp. cleaning up topsoil mess: Damaged fields being restored after soil layer removed to cover BunkerHill Superfund site. Spokesman Review, SpokaneWA. June 29, 2001.
  6. Svendsen A J, Brown S L, and Henry C L 2001 Use of biosolids and lime to ameliorate subsoil acidity in mine tailings. In Proc. 6th International Conference on the Biogeochemistry of Trace Elements. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada 29 July – 2 August. p. 36.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 229

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Brown, S. L., Henry, C. L., Chaney, R., Compton, H., & DeVolder, P. S.
Affiliations
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Sally L.
ORCID
Venue
Plant and Soil
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-02
Volume
249
Issue
1
Pages
203-215
ISSN
  • 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5036
DOI
10.1023/a:1022558013310
OpenAlex
W2160560463
Cited by
229
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 19
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Mine drainage and remediation techniques
Keywords
municipal biosolids, mine waste remediation, metal-contaminated soil, wood ash, pulp and paper sludge, woody debris, compost, soil amendment, subsoil acidity, extractable metals, zinc, lead, cadmium, revegetation, plant biomass, lime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review