Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,167Efficiency Analysis Using DEAOptimization and Variational AnalysisAgricultural economics and policies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency

Open access
Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., Färe, R.·1998·Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
DOI 10.1023/a:1022637501082
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The directional technology distance function is introduced, given an interpretation as a min-max, and compared with other functional representations of the technology including the Shephard input and output distance functions and the McFadden gauge function. A dual correspondence is developed between the directional technology distance function and the profit function, and it is shown that all previous dual correspondences are special cases of this correspondence. We then show how Nerlovian (profit-based) efficiency measures can be computed using the directional technology distance function.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1022637501082

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Luenberger, D., Microeconomic Theory, McGraw Hill, New York, New York, 1995.
  2. Chung, Y., Directional Distance Functions and Undesirable Outputs, PhD Thesis, Southern Illinois University, 1996.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1998-08
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
351-364
ISSN
  • 0022-3239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2878
DOI
10.1023/a:1022637501082
OpenAlex
W1595334554
Cited by
1,167
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 62
FWCI
11.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Optimization and Variational Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
directional distance function, profit function, duality, efficiency indicators, production technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.