Cited by 12Physiological and biochemical adaptationsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Anabolic Rates Measured by Calorespirometry for Eleven Subpopulation of Bromus tectorum Match Temperature Profiles of Local Microclimates1

McCarlie, V. W., Hansen, L. D., Smith, B. N., Monsen, S. B., Ellingson, D. J.·2003·Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1022917013029

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarlie, V. W., Hansen, L. D., Smith, B. N., Monsen, S. B., & Ellingson, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, B. N.
Venue
Russian Journal of Plant Physiology
Published
2003-03
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
183-191
ISSN
  • 0015-3303 (ISSN-L)
  • 1021-4437
  • 1608-3407
OpenAlex
W263115517
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Russian Journal of Plant Physiology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • U.S. Forest Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
cheatgrass, growth rate, temperature sensitivity, subpopulations, local microclimate, thermal adaptation, forest fires, invasive weeds, respiratory rate, respiratory efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review