Teaching Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Science Courses
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students' critical thinking was improved significantly due to the developed learning material.
“Students' critical thinking was improved significantly due to the developed learning material (Bailin, 2002;Hager, Sleet, Logan, & Hooper, 2003;Lee, Green, Johnson, & Nyquist, 2010).”
From IMPLEMENTATION OF INNOVATIVE CHEMISTRY LEARNING MATERIAL WITH GUIDED TASKS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ COMPETENCE (2018) · cites this paper as Hager, Sleet, Logan, & Hooper, 2003
Cites
Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.17118 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Altun, E., & Yildirim, N. (2023) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101367 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Situmorang, M., Sinaga, M., Purba, J., Daulay, S. I., Simorangkir, M., Sitorus, M., & Sudrajat, A. (2018) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/18.17.535 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hager, P., Sleet, R., Logan, P., & Hooper, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hager, Paul
- ORCID
- Hager, Paul
- Venue
- Science & Education
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 303-313
- ISSN
- 0926-7220 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1901
- OpenAlex
- W1498600901
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 9.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Science & Education (publishedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Keywords
- critical thinking, undergraduate science education, first-year students, cooperative learning, critical thinking disposition, critical incident interviews
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
