Cited by 109Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy and Theoretical SciencePhenomenology and Existential Philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Against Vague Existence

Sider, Theodore·2003·Philosophical Studies

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1024465319036

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hawthorne, J. (forthcoming): Article on endurance and perdurance, in J. Hawthorne, T. Sider and D.W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell.
  2. Williamson, T. (1994): Vagueness, London and New York: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–109 of 109

Metadata

Authors
Sider, T.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Sider, Theodore
Venue
Philosophical Studies
Published
2003-05
Volume
114
Issue
1-2
Pages
135-146
ISSN
  • 0031-8116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0883
OpenAlex
W161882535
Cited by
107
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
32.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophical Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Keywords
vagueness, existence, metaphysics of vagueness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review