Bioethics in a Multicultural World: Medicine and Morality in Pluralistic Settings
Abstract
Current approaches in bioethics largely overlook the multicultural social environment within which most contemporary ethical issues unfold. For example, principlists argue that the "common morality" of "society" supports four basic ethical principles. These principles, and the common morality more generally, are supposed to be a matter of shared "common sense." Defenders of case-based approaches to moral reasoning similarly assume that moral reasoning proceeds on the basis of common moral intuitions. Both of these approaches fail to recognize the existence of multiple cultural and religious traditions in contemporary multicultural societies. In multicultural settings, patients and their families bring many different cultural models of morality, health, illness, healing, and kinship to clinical encounters. Religious convictions and cultural norms play significant roles in the framing of moral issues. At present, mainstream bioethics fails to attend to the particular moral worlds of patients and their family members. A more anthropologically informed understanding of the ethical issues that emerge within health care facilities will need to better recognize the role of culture and religion in shaping modes of moral deliberation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The process of translating principles in AI Ethics will likely encounter incommensurable moral norms and frameworks which present true moral dilemmas that principlism cannot resolve.
“This process will likely encounter incommensurable moral norms and frameworks which present true moral dilemmas that principlism cannot resolve.”
From Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019) · cites this paper as [49]
A universally accepted hierarchy of principles to prioritise competing norms does not exist.
“A universally accepted hierarchy of principles to prioritise competing norms does not exist.”
From Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 75
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J. (1979) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 1st Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J. (1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J. (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Berger, J. (1998) Cultural Discrimination in Mechanisms for Health Decisions: A View from New York. Journal of Clinical Ethics 9 (2), 127-131. · DOI
- Berger, P. (1967) The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York: Anchor Books.
- Beyene, Y. (1992) Medical Disclosure and Refugees: Telling Bad News to Ethiopian Patients. Western Journal of Medicine 157 (3), 328-332.
- Blackhall, L. J., Frank, G., Murphy, S., and Michel, V. (2001) Bioethics in a Different Tongue: The Case of Truth-Telling. Journal of Urban Health 78 (1), 59-71. · DOI
- Carrese, J. and Rhodes, L. (2000) Bridging Cultural Differences in Medical Practice: The Case of Discussing Negative Information With Navajo Patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine 15, 92-96. · DOI
- Carrese, J. and Rhodes, L. (1995) Western Bioethics on the Navajo Reservation: Benefit or Harm? Journal of the American Medical Association 274 (10), 826-829. · DOI
- Edgerton, R. (1992) Sick Societies: Challenging the Myth of Primitive Harmony. New York: Free Press.
- Engelhardt, Jr., H. (1991) Bioethics and Secular Humanism: The Search for a Common Morality. Philadelphia: Trinity Press International.
- Engelhardt, Jr., H. (1999) Bioethics in the Third Millenium: Some Critical Anticipations. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9(3), 225-243. · DOI
- Fox, R. (1989) The Sociology of Bioethics, In The Sociology of Medicine: A Participant Observer's View. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
- Fox, R. and Swazey, J. (1984) Medical Morality is Not Bioethics: Medical Ethics in China and the United States. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 27 (3), 336-360. · DOI
- Frank, G., Blackhall, L., Michel, V., Murphy, S., Azen, S. and Park, K. (1998) A Discourse of Relationships in Bioethics: Patient Autonomy and End-of-Life Decision Making Among Elderly Korean Americans. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 12 (4), 403-423. · DOI
- Friedman, T. (1999) The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization. New York: Farar, Straus, Giroux.
- Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. USA: BasicBooks.
- Gilligan, C. (1982) In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Goodman, N. (1978) Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. · DOI
- Gordon, D. (1990) Embodying Illness, Embodying Cancer. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 14 (2), 275-297. · DOI
- Gordon, D. and Paci, E. (1997) Disclosure Practices and Cultural Narratives: Understanding Concealment and Silence Around Cancer in Tuscany, Italy. Social Science and Medicine 44 (10), 1433-1452. · DOI
- Hatch, E. (1983) Culture and Morality: The Relativity of Values in Anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Hern, Jr., H., Koenig, B., Moore, L. and Marshall, P. (1998) The Difference that Culture Can Make in End-of-Life Decisionmaking. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7, 27-40. · DOI
- Hoffmaster, B. (1992) Can Ethnography Save the Life of Medical Ethics? Social Science and Medicine 35 (12), 1421-1432. · DOI
- Holm, S. (1995) Not Just Autonomy—The Principles of American Biomedical Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 21, 332-338. · DOI
- Ignatieff, M. (1998) The Warrior's Honour: Ethnic War and the Modern Conscience. Toronto: Penguin Books Canada.
- Kleinman, A. (1995) Writing at the Margin: Discourse Between Anthropology and Medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Koenig, B. and Gates-Williams, J. (1995) Understanding Cultural Differences in Caring for Dying Patients. Western Journal of Medicine 163 (3), 244-249.
- Lane, S. and Rubinstein, R. (1996) Judging the Other: Responding to Traditional Female Genital Surgeries. Hastings Center Report 26 (3), 31-40. · DOI
- Levenson, J. (2000) The New Enemies of Circumcision. Commentary 109 (3), 29-36.
- Long, S. (1999) Family Surrogacy and Cancer Disclosure: Physician-Family Negotiation of an Ethical Dilemma in Japan. Journal of Palliative Care 15 (3), 31-42. · DOI
- MacIntyre, A. (1981) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
- Macklin, R. (1999) Against Relativism: Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universals in Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
- Marshall, P. (1992) Anthropology and Bioethics. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 6 (1), 49-73. · DOI
- Muller, J. (1994) Anthropology, Bioethics, and Medicine: A Provocative Trilogy. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 8 (4), 448-467. · DOI
- Orona, C., Koenig, B. and Davis, A. (1994) Cultural Aspects of Nondisclosure. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3, 338-346. · DOI
- Pang, M. (1999) Protective Truthfulness: The Chinese Way of Safeguarding Patients in Informed Treatment Decisions. Journal of Medical Ethics 25, 247-253. · DOI
- Rawls, J. (1999) The Law of Peoples; with, The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Roberts, L., Battaglia, J., Smithpeter, M. and Epstein, R. (1999) An Office on Main Street: Health Care Dilemmas in Small Communities. Hastings Center Report 29 (4), 28-37. · DOI
- Scheper-Hughes, N. (1995) The Primacy of the Ethical: Propositions for a Militant Anthropology. Current Anthropology 36 (3), 409-420. · DOI · Paper page
- Scheper-Hughes, N. (1996) Theft of Life: The Globalization of Organ Stealing Rumours. Anthropology Today 12 (3), 3-11. · DOI
- Zussman, R. (2000) The Contribution of Sociology to Medical Ethics. Hastings Center Report 30 (1), 7-11. · DOI
- Authors
- Turner, L.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Turner, Leigh
- ORCID
- Turner, Leigh
- Venue
- Health Care Analysis
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 99-117
- ISSN
- 1065-3058 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3394
- OpenAlex
- W69992814
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Health Care Analysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Keywords
- bioethics, multiculturalism, cultural diversity in health care, religious beliefs, moral pluralism, principlism, common morality, moral intuitions, kinship, anthropological ethics, moral deliberation
- MeSH terms
- Anthropology, Cultural, Humans, Morals, Social Sciences, Cultural Diversity, Bioethical Issues
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review