Cited by 60Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningMedical Coding and Health InformationSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bias in Completeness of Birthplace Data for Asian Groups in a Population-Based Cancer Registry (United States)

Abstract

Data on place of birth are routinely collected by population-based cancer registries in the United States and are used to study effects of immigration on cancer patterns in Asian migrants, who comprise about a quarter of the US immigrant population. However, the quality of this research, which has the potential for informing cancer etiology and control, is unclear because registry birthplace information is incomplete, and its accuracy has not been examined. We quantified misclassification of birthplace data for Asian cancer patients in the Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry in northern California by comparing registry birthplace information with self-reported birthplace from interview, and then identified sociodemographic and hospital characteristics associated with birthplace completeness and misclassification. Of the 1836 eligible Asian patients, 649 (35%) had unrecorded registry birthplace. For all except Vietnamese, these persons were less likely than those with recorded birthplace to be foreign-born (OR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.4-0.7), to be diagnosed in public than private hospitals (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.5-0.8) and in teaching than non-teaching hospitals (OR = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.6-1.1), and were more likely to have been diagnosed at a large regional health maintenance organization (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.3-2.2) and after 1995 (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1-2.1). Among Asians with registry birthplace information (n = 1187), sensitivity and predictive value positive for birthplace exceeded 90…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:caco.0000024244.91775.64

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ten of these (66%) identified that the incomplete data led to validity issues, most commonly that these data were not missing at random and had the potential to introduce bias.

    “Ten of these (66%) identified that the incomplete data led to validity issues, most commonly that these data were not missing at random and had the potential to introduced bias.12,34,43–50”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Miller BA, Kolonel LN, Bernstein L, et al. Racial/Ethnic Patterns of Cancer in the United States, 1988-1992. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1996.
  2. Lin SS, O'Malley CD, Lui SW (2001) Factors associated with missing birthplace information in a population-based cancer registry. Ethnicity Dis. 11: 598–605.
  3. Cook LS, Goldoft M, Schwartz SM, Weiss NS (1998) Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the prostate in Asian migrants to the United States and their descendants. J Urol 161: 152–155. · DOI
  4. Flood DM, Weiss NS, Cook LS, Emerson JC, Schwartz SM, Potter JD (2000) Colorectal cancer incidence in Asian migrants to the United States and their descendants. Cancer Causes Control 11(5): 403–411. · DOI
  5. Herrinton LJ, Stanford JL, Schwartz SM, Weiss NS (1994) Ovarian cancer incidence among Asian migrants to the United States and their descendants. J Natl Cancer Inst 86(17): 1336–1339. · DOI
  6. Herrinton LJ, Goldoft M, Schwartz SM, Weiss NS (1996) The incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and its histologic subtypes in Asian migrants to the United States and their descendants. Cancer Causes Control 7(2): 224–230. · DOI
  7. Kamineni A, Williams MA, Schwartz SM, Cook LS, Weiss NS (1999) The incidence of gastric carcinoma in Asian migrants to the United States and their descendants. Cancer Causes Control 10(1): 77–83. · DOI
  8. Rosenblatt KA, Weiss NS, Schwartz SM (1996) Liver cancer in Asian migrants to the United States and their descendants. Cancer Causes Control 7: 345–350. · DOI
  9. Rossing MA, Schwartz SM, Weiss NS (1995) Thyroid cancer incidence in Asian migrants to the United States and their descendants. Cancer Causes Control 6(5): 439–444. · DOI
  10. Stanford JL, Herrinton LJ, Schwartz SM, Weiss NS (1995) Breast cancer incidence in Asian migrants to the United States and their descendants. Epidemiology 6(2): 181–183. · DOI
  11. Hedeen AN, White E, Taylor V (1999) Ethnicity and birthplace in relation to tumor size and stage in Asian American women with breast cancer. Am J Public Health 89(8): 1248–1252. · DOI
  12. Pineda MD, White E, Kristal AR, Taylor V (2001) Asian breast cancer survival in the US: a comparison between Asian immigrants, US-born Asian Americans and Caucasians. Int J Epidemiol 30: 976–982. · DOI
  13. Kerlikowske K, Molinaro A, Cha I, et al. (2003) Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(22): 1692–1702. · DOI
  14. Horn-Ross PL, John EM, Lee M, et al. (2001) Phytoestrogen consumption and breast cancer risk in a multiethnic population: the Bay Area Breast Cancer Study. Am J Epidemiol 154(5): 434–441. · DOI
  15. Lee MM, Lin SS, Wrensch MR, Adler SR, Eisenberg D (2000) Alternative therapies used by women with breast cancer in four ethnic populations. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(1): 42–47. · DOI
  16. Bloom JR, Stewart SL, Johnston M, Banks P (1998) Intrusiveness of illness and quality of life in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 7(2): 89–100. · DOI
  17. Glaser SL, Dorfman RF, Clarke CA (2001) Expert review of the diagnosis and histologic classification of Hodgkin disease in a population-based cancer registry: interobserver reliability and impact on incidence and survival rates. Cancer 92(2): 218–224. · DOI
  18. Horn-Ross PL, Morris JS, Lee M, et al. (2001) Iodine and thyroid cancer risk among women in a multiethnic population: the Bay Area Thyroid Cancer Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10(9): 979–985.
  19. Whittemore AS, Kolonel LN, Wu AH, et al. (1995) Prostate cancer in relation to diet, physical activity, and body size in blacks, whites, and Asians in the United States and Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 87(9): 652–661. · DOI
  20. Holly EA, Lele C, Bracci PM (1998) Hair-color products and risk for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a population-based study in the San Francisco bay area. Am J Public Health 88(12): 1767–1773. · DOI
  21. Swallen KC, West DW, Stewart SL, Glaser SL, Horn-Ross PL (1997) Predictors of misclassification of Hispanic ethnicity in a population-based cancer registry. Ann Epidemiol 7(3): 200–206. · DOI
  22. Swallen KC, Glaser SL, Stewart SL, West DW, Jenkins CN, McPhee SJ (1998) Accuracy of racial classification of Vietnamese patients in a population-based cancer registry. Ethn Dis 8(2): 218–227.
  23. Killoran M, Schlitz MJ, Lewis N (2002) 'Unremarkable' recoveries: normalizing adversity and cancer survival. Qual Health Res 12(2): 208–222. · DOI
  24. Wrensch M, Lee M, Miike R, et al. (1997) Familial and personal medical history of cancer and nervous system conditions among adults with glioma and controls. Am J Epidemiol 145(7): 581–593. · DOI
  25. Sakoda LC, Horn-Ross PL (2002) Reproductive and menstrual history and papillary thyroid cancer risk: the Bay Area Thyroid Cancer Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11(1): 51–57.
  26. Horn-Ross PL, Hoggatt KJ, Lee M (2002) Phytoestrogens and thyroid cancer risk: the San Francisco Bay Area thyroid cancer study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11(1): 43–49.
  27. Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd. Edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  28. Hedeen AN, White E (2001) Breast cancer size and stage in Hispanic American women, by birthplace, 1992-1995. Am J Public Health 91(1): 122–125. · DOI
  29. Nelson LM, Longstreth WT, Jr, Koepsell TD, van Belle G (1990) Proxy respondents in epidemiologic research. Epidemiol Rev 12: 71–86. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gomez, S. L., Glaser, S. L., Kelsey, J. L., & Lee, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Prevention Institute of California (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Gomez, Scarlett L.
Venue
Cancer Causes & Control
Published
2004-04
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
243-253
ISSN
  • 0957-5243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7225
OpenAlex
W2070038604
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Causes & Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01cn065107-001)
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA066521, 1T32CA66521, N01-CN-65107)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
data completeness, misclassification, Asian immigrants, cancer registry data quality, hospital characteristics, health maintenance organizations, language preference
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Asian, California, Emigration and Immigration, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Registries, Residence Characteristics, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Bias, Odds Ratio, SEER Program

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review