The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are reports of posttraumatic growth positively biased?
Abstract
This study examines positivity bias in reports of growth following exposure to traumatic events. Participants (N = 276) from an urban university and a superior court jury pool were randomly assigned to one of two methodological groups. In one, participants responded to the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) in relation to a specific stressful event. In the other, PTGI questions were not linked to specific events. Findings indicate that current methods for assessing posttraumatic growth (PTG) may actually underestimate growth. That is, linking questions about growth to specific stressors may have led participants to be cautious about attributing their growth experiences to a traumatic event. These findings contradict notions that current methods of measuring PTG create a positivity bias. Suggestions for future research include the use of prospective designs and corroborating reports of growth.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The study also relied on self-reported measures, which may introduce response biases such as retrospective recall inaccuracies or positivity bias regarding posttraumatic growth (Smith and Cook, 2004).”
From Exploring the relationship between post-earthquake trauma, post-traumatic growth, and self-compassion (2026) · cites this paper as Smith and Cook, 2004
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
The posttraumatic growth inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.2490090305 · Cited by 7,061 · cited 9×
“These positive outcomes include changes in the self, in relationship with others, and philosophy of life (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAdjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation.
Taylor, S. E. (1983) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.38.11.1161 · Cited by 3,176
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Sciacca, F., Sharma, R., & Knipe, H. (2020) · Radiopaedia.org · doi:10.53347/rid-80880 · Cited by 2,395
Trauma & Transformation: Growing in the Aftermath of Suffering
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1995) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483326931 · Cited by 1,909
Assessment and Prediction of Stress‐Related Growth
Park, C. L., Cohen, L. H., & Murch, R. L. (1996) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00815.x · Cited by 1,657
Norris, F. H. (1992) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.60.3.409 · Cited by 1,527
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluating Resource Gain: Understanding and Misunderstanding Posttraumatic Growth
Tedeschi, R. G., Calhoun, L. G., & Cann, A. (2007) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00299.x · Cited by 292
Butler, L. D., Blasey, C. M., Garlan, R. W., McCaslin, S. E., Azarow, J., Chen, X.-H., Desjardins, J. C., DiMiceli, S., Seagraves, D. A., Hastings, T. A., et al. (2005) · Traumatology · doi:10.1177/153476560501100405 · Cited by 236
Reliability and Validity of a Spanish Version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory
Weiss, T., & Berger, R. (2006) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731505281374 · Cited by 192
Shakespeare‐Finch, J., & Armstrong, D. (2010) · Journal of Loss and Trauma · doi:10.1080/15325020903373151 · Cited by 177
Mindfulness and its efficacy for psychological and biological responses in women with breast cancer
Kenne Sarenmalm, E., Mårtensson, L. B., Andersson, B. A., Karlsson, P., & Bergh, I. (2017) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.1052 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, S. G., & Cook, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Sharon G.
- Venue
- Journal of Traumatic Stress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 353-358
- ISSN
- 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6598
- OpenAlex
- W2100737133
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- posttraumatic growth, positivity bias, measurement bias, Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, traumatic events, self-report measures
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, False Negative Reactions, False Positive Reactions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Urban Population, Bias, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
