Cited by 61Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesWildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Discrimination of native and exotic forest patterns through shape irregularity indices: An analysis in the landscapes of Galicia, Spain

Saura, Santiago, Carballal, Pedro·2004·Landscape Ecology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:land.0000042905.97437.78

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Saura, S., & Carballal, P.
Affiliations
Universitat de Lleida (ES)
Corresponding author
Saura, Santiago
Venue
Landscape Ecology
Published
2004-08
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
647-662
ISSN
0921-2973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167266720
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Landscape Ecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Keywords
native forest, exotic forest plantations, forest plantations, landscape fragmentation, perimeter-to-area ratio, fractal dimension, tree species richness, human impact on landscape, Galicia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review