CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 615Forest Ecology and ConservationAgroforestry and silvopastoral systemsAfrican Botany and Ecology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The enigma of tropical homegardens

Kumar, B.M., Nair, P.K.R.·2004·Agroforestry Systems
DOI 10.1023/b:agfo.0000028995.13227.ca
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:agfo.0000028995.13227.ca

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 112

  1. Abdoellah O.S. 1990. Homegardens in West Java and their future development. pp. 69–79. In: Landauer K. and Brazil M. (eds), Tropical Homegardens, United Nations University Press, Tokyo.
  2. Abdoellah O.S., Takeuchi K., Perikesit G.B. and Hadikusumah H.Y. 2001. Structure and function of homegarden revisited. pp. 167–185. In: Proc. First Seminar toward Harmonisation between Development and Environmental Conservation in Biological Production. JSPS-DGHE Core University Program in Applied Biosciences. The University of Tokyo, Tokyo.
  3. Agelet A., Angels B.M., Valles J. 2000. Homegardens and their role as a main source of medicinal plants in mountain regions of Catalonia (Iberian peninsula). Econ Bot 54: 295–309. · DOI
  4. Alavalapati J.R.R., Shrestha R.K., Stainback G.A. and Matta J.R. 2004. Agroforestry development: An environmental economic perspective (This volume). · DOI
  5. Anderson E.N. 1993. Gardens in tropical America and tropical Asia. Biótica (nueva época) 1: 81–102.
  6. Arifin H.S., Sakamoto K. and Chiba K. 1997. Effects of the fragmentation and change of the social and economical aspects on the vegetation structure in the rural homegardens of West Java. J Jap Inst. Landscape Architect 60: 489–494. · DOI
  7. Arnold J.E.M. 1987. Economic considerations in agroforestry. pp. 173–190. In: Steppler H.A. and Nair P.K.R. (eds), Agroforestry: A Decade of Development, ICRAF, Nairobi.
  8. Asfaw Z. and Woldu Z. 1997. Crop associations of homegardens in Welayta and Gurage in southern Ethiopia. Sinet (an Ethiopian J Sci) 20: 73–90.
  9. Ashokan P.K. and Kumar B.M. 1997. Cropping systems and their water use. pp. 200–206. In: Thampi K.B., Nayar N.M. and Nair C.S. (eds), The Natural Resources of Kerala. World Wide Fund for Nature - India, Kerala State Office, Thiruvananthapuram 14, Kerala, India.
  10. Backes M.M. 2001. The role of indigenous trees for the conservation of biocultural diversity in traditional Agroforestry land use systems: The Bungoma case study. Agroforest. Syst 52: 119–132. · DOI
  11. Benjamin T.J., Montañez P.L., Jiménez J.J.M. and Gillespie A.R. 2001. Carbon, water and nutrient flux in Maya homegardens in the Yucatan peninsula of México. Agroforest Syst 53: 103–111. · DOI
  12. Black G.M., Somnasang P., Thamathawan S. and Newman J.M. 1996. Cultivating continuity and creating change: women's homegarden practices in northeastern Thailand. Multi-cultural considerations from cropping to consumption. Agriculture Human Values 13: 3–11. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Brownrigg L. 1985. Home Gardening in International Development: What the Literature Shows. The League for International Food Education, Washington, DC, 330 pp.
  14. Caballero K. 1992. Mayan homegardens: past, present and future. Etnóecolgica 1: 35–54.
  15. Caron C.M. 1995. The role of nontimber tree products in household food procurement strategies: profile of a Sri Lankan village. Agroforest Syst 32: 99–117. · DOI
  16. Ceccolini L. 2002. The homegardens of Soqotra island, Yemen: an example of agroforestry approach to multiple land use in an isolated location. Agroforest Syst 56: 107–115. · DOI
  17. Christanty L. 1990. Homegardens in tropical Asia with special reference to Indonesia. pp. 9–20. In: Landauer K. and Brazil M. (eds), Tropical Homegardens. United Nations University Press, Tokyo.
  18. Christanty L., Abdoellah O.L., Marten G.G. and Iskandar J. 1986. Traditional agroforestry in West Java: the Pekaranagan (homegarden) and Kebun-Talun (annual-perennial rotation) cropping systems. pp. 132–158. In: Marten G.G. (ed.), Traditional Agriculture in South East Asia. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
  19. Clarke W.C. and Thaman R.R. (eds) 1993. Agroforestry in the Pacific Islands. United Nations University, Tokyo, 224 pp.
  20. De Clerck F.A.J. and Negreros-Castillo P. 2000. Plant species of traditional Mayan homegardens of Mexico as analogs for multistrata agroforests. Agroforest Syst 48: 303–317. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Delaney M. and Roshetko J.M. 1999. Field test of carbon monitoring methods for homegardens in Indonesia. Field Tests of Carbon Monitoring Methods in Forestry Projects, pp. 45–51. Winrock International, Arlington, VA.
  22. Drescher A.W. 1996. Management strategies in African homegardens and the need for new extension approaches. pp. 231–245. In: Heidhues F. and Fadani A. (eds), Food Security and Innovations - Successes and Lessons Learned, Peter Lang, Frankfurt.
  23. Dury S., Vilcosqui L. and Mary F. 1996. Durian trees (Durio zibethinus Murr.) in Javanese homegardens: their importance in informal financial systems. Agroforest Syst 33: 215–230. · DOI
  24. Esquivel M. and Hammer K. 1992. The Cuban homegarden 'conuco': a perspective environment for evolution and in situ conservation of plant genetic resources. Genet Resour Crop Evol 39: 9–22. · DOI
  25. Ewel J.J. 1999. Natural systems as models for the design of sustainable systems of land use. Agroforest Syst 45: 1–21. · DOI
  26. Fassbender H. 1993 Modelos Edafológicos de Sistemas Agroforestales, 2nd Ed., CATIE/GTZ, Turrialba, 530 pp.
  27. Fernandes E.C.M. and Nair P.K.R. 1986. An evaluation of the structure and function of tropical homegardens. Agr Syst 21: 279–310. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Gajaseni J. and Gajaseni N. 1999. Ecological rationalities of the traditional homegarden system in the Chao Phraya Basin, Thailand. Agroforest Syst 46: 3–23. · DOI · Paper page
  29. George S.J. and Kumar B.M. 1998. Litter dynamics and soil fertility improvement in silvopastoral systems of the humid tropics of Southern India. Intl Tree Crops J 9: 267–282. · DOI
  30. Gillespie A.R., Knudson D.M. and Geilfus F. 1993. The structure of four homegardens in the Peten, Guatemala. Agroforest Syst 24: 157–170. · DOI
  31. Gliessman S.R. (ed.) 1990. Integrating trees into agriculture: the homegarden agroecosystem as an example of agroforestry in the tropics. Agroecology: Researching the Ecological Basis for Sustainable Agriculture, pp. 160–168. Ecological Studies 78, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA. · DOI
  32. Gopikumar K., Hegde R. and Babu L.C. 2001. Decomposition and nutrient release pattern of leaf litters of mangium (Acacia mangium Willd.) Indian J Agroforest 3: 11–22.
  33. Guillaumet J.L., Grenand P., Bahri S., Grenand F., Lourd M., Santos A.A. dos and Gely A. 1990. The homegarden orchards of the central Amazon: an example of space utilization. Turrialba 40: 63–81.
  34. Heal O.W., Anderson J.M. and Swift M.J. 1997. Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. pp. 3–30. In: Cadish G. and Giller K.E. (eds), Driven by Nature: Plant Quality and Decomposition, CAB International, Wallingford.
  35. High C. and Shackleton C.M. 2000. The comparative value of wild and domestic plants in homegardens of a South African rural village. Agroforest Syst 48: 141–156. · DOI
  36. Hochegger K. 1998. Farming like the forest: traditional homegarden systems in Sri Lanka. Tropical Agroecology, Margraf Verlag, Weikersheim, 203 pp.
  37. Hutterer K.L. 1984. Ecology and evolution of agriculture in Southeast Asia. In: Rambo A.T. and Sajise P.E. (eds), An Introduction to Human Ecology Research on Agricultural Systems in Southeast Asia. University of Philippines, Los Banos.
  38. Issac S.R. and Nair M.A. 2002. Litter decay: weight loss and N dynamics of jack leaf litter on open and shaded sites. Indian J Agrofor 4: 35–39.
  39. Jacob V.J. and Alles W.S. 1987. The Kandyan gardens of Sri Lanka. Agroforest Syst 5: 123–137. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Jensen M. 1993a. Productivity and nutrient cycling of a Javanese homegarden. Agroforest Syst 24: 187–201. · DOI
  41. Jensen M. 1993b. Soil conditions, vegetation structure and biomass of a Javanese homegarden. Agroforest Syst 24: 171–186. · DOI
  42. John J. and Nair M.A. 1999. Crop-tree inventory of the homegardens in Southern Kerala. J. Trop Agric 37: 110–114.
  43. Jordan C.F. 1985. Nutrient Cycling in Tropical Forest Ecosystems. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 189 pp.
  44. Jose D. and Shanmugaratnam N. 1993. Traditional homegardens of Kerala: a sustainable human ecosystem. Agroforest Syst 24: 203–213. · DOI
  45. Karyono 1990. Homegardens in Java; their structure and function. pp. 138–146. In: Landauer K. and Brazil M. (eds), Tropical Homegardens, United Nations University Press, Tokyo.
  46. Kehlenbeck K. and Mass B.L. 2004. Crop diversity and classification of homegardens in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Agroforest Syst (in press). · DOI
  47. Kerala State Land Use Board (KSLUB) 1995. Land Resources of Kerala State. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 209 pp.
  48. Krishnankutty C.N. 1990. Demand and supply of wood in Kerala and their future trends. Research Report 67. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala, 66 pp.
  49. Kumar B.M. and Divakara B.N. 2001. Proximity, clump size and root distribution pattern in bamboo: A case study of Bambusa arundinacea (Retz.) Willd., Poaceae, in the Ultisols of Kerala, India. J Bamboo and Rattan 1: 43–58. · DOI
  50. Kumar B.M., George S.J., Jamaludheen V. and Suresh T.K. 1998. Comparison of biomass production, tree allometry and nutrient use efficiency of multipurpose trees grown in wood lot and silvopastoral experiments in Kerala, India. Forest Ecol Manag 112: 145–163. · DOI
  51. Kumar B.M, George S.J. and Chinnamani S. 1994. Diversity, structure and standing stock of wood in the homegardens of Kerala in peninsular India. Agroforest Syst 25: 243–262. · DOI
  52. Kumar S.S., Kumar B.M., Wahid P.A., Kamalam N.V. and Fisher R.F. 1999. Root competition for phosphorus between coconut, multipurpose trees and kacholam (Kaempferia galanga) in Kerala, India. Agroforest Syst 46: 131–146. · DOI
  53. Landauer K. and Brazil M. (eds) 1990. Tropical Homegardens. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, 257 pp.
  54. Lavelle P., Blanchart E., Martin A., Martin S., Spain A., Toutain F., Barois I. and Schaefer R. 1993. A hierarchical model for decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: application to soils of the humid tropics. Biotropica 25: 130–150. · DOI
  55. Leith H. 1975. Primary production of major vegetation units of the world. pp. 203–215. In: Leith H. and Whittaker R.H. (eds), Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Springer-Verlag, New York. · DOI
  56. Leiva J.M., Azurdia C., Ovando W., López E. and Ayala H. 2002. Contributions of homegardens to in situ conservation in traditional farming systems-Guatemalan component. pp. 56–72. In: Watson J.W. and Eyzaguirre P.B. (eds), Homegardens and In Situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources in Farming Systems. Proc Second International Homegarden Workshop, 17–19 July 2001. Witzenhausen, Germany, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.
  57. Leuschner W.A. and Khaleque K. 1987. Homestead Agroforestry in Bangladesh. Agroforest Syst 5: 139–151. · DOI
  58. Levasseur V. and Olivier A. 2000. The farming system and traditional agroforestry systems in the Maya community of San Jose, Belize. Agroforest Syst 49: 275–288. · DOI
  59. Mathew T., Kumar B.M., Suresh Babu K.V. and Umamaheswaran K. 1996. Evaluation of some live standards for black pepper. J Plant Crops 24: 86–91.
  60. Mendez V.E., Lok R., Somarriba E. 2001. Interdisciplinary analysis of homegardens in Nicaragua: micro-zonation, plant use and socioeconomic importance. Agroforest Syst 51: 85–96. · DOI · Paper page
  61. Menon T.M., Tyagi D. and Kulirani B.F. (eds) 2002. People of India: Kerala: Volume XXVII. Affiliated East-West Press for Anthropological Survey of India, New Delhi, 1704 pp.
  62. Michon G. and deForesta H. 1999. Agro-Forests: Incorporating a forest vision in agroforestry. pp. 381–406. In: Buck L.E., Lassoie J.P. and Fernandes E.C.M. (eds), Agroforestry in Sustainable Agricultural Systems, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  63. Michon G. and Mary F. 1990. Transforming traditional homegardens and related systems in West java (Bogor) and West Sumatra (Maninjau). pp. 169–185. In: Landauer K. and Brazil M. (eds), Tropical Homegardens. United Nations University Press, Tokyo.
  64. Michon G. and Mary F. 1994. Conversion of traditional village gardens and new economic strategies of rural households in the area of Bogor, Indonesia. Agroforest Syst 25: 31–58. · DOI · Paper page
  65. Michon G., Bompard J., Hecketsweiler P. and Ducatillion C. 1983. Tropical forest architectural analysis applied to agroforests in the humid tropics, the example of traditional village agroforestry in West Java. Agroforest Syst 1: 117–129. · DOI
  66. Millat-e-Mustafa M.D., Hall J.B., Teklehaimanot Z. 1996. Structure and floristics of Bangladesh homegardens. Agroforest Syst 33: 263–280. · DOI
  67. Molina M.R., Noguera A., Dary O., Chew F., Valverde C. 1993. Principal micronutrient deficiencies in Central America. Food Nutr Agric 7: 26–33.
  68. Montagnini F. and Nair P.K.R. 2004. Carbon sequestration: An underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems (This volume). · DOI
  69. Mpoyi K., Lukebakio N., Kapende K. and Paulus J. 1994. Inventaire de la flore domestique des parcelles d'habitation. Cas de Kinshasa (Zaire). Revue de Medecine et Pharmacopee Africaine 8: 55–66.
  70. Muschler R.G. 2001. Shade improves coffee quality in a suboptimal coffee-zone of Costa Rica. Agroforest Syst 51: 131–139. · DOI
  71. Nair M.A. and Sreedharan C. 1986. Agroforestry farming systems the homesteads of Kerala, southern India. Agroforest Syst 4: 339–363. · DOI
  72. Nair P.K.R. 1979. Intensive Multiple Cropping with Coconuts in India: Principles, Programmes and Prospects. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, 147 pp.
  73. Nair P.K.R. 1987. Agroforestry systems inventory. Agroforest Syst 5: 301–317. · DOI
  74. Nair P.K.R. (ed.) 1989. Agroforestry Systems in the Tropics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 664 pp.
  75. Nair P.K.R. 2001. Do tropical homegardens elude science, or is it the other way around? Agroforest Syst 53: 239–245. · DOI
  76. Nair P.K.R., Buresh R.J., Mugendi D.N. and Latt C.R. 1999. Nutrient cycling in tropical agroforesty systems: Myths and science. pp. 1–31. In: Buck L.E., Lassoie J.P. and Fernandes E.C.M. (eds), Agroforestry in Sustainable Agricultural Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  77. Niñez V.K. 1987. Household gardens: theoretical and policy considerations. Agr Syst 23: 167–186. · DOI
  78. Odum E.P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164: 24–270.
  79. Olson J.S. 1963. Energy storage and balance of production and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44: 322–331. · DOI
  80. Padoch C. and de Jong W. 1991. The housegardens of Santa Rosa: diversity and variability in an Amazonian agricultural system. Econ Bot 45: 166–175. · DOI
  81. Palm C.A., Gachengo C.N., Delve R.J., Cadisch G. and Giller K.E. 2001. Organic inputs for soil fertility management in tropical agroecosystems: application of an organic resource database. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83: 27–42. · DOI
  82. Puri S. and Nair P.K.R. 2004. Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program (This volume). · DOI
  83. Quiroz C., Gutiérrez M., Rodriguez D., Perz D., Ynfante J., Gamex J., Perz de Fernandex T., Marques A. and Pacheco W. 2002. Homegardens and in situ conservation of Agrobiodiversity - Venezuelan component. pp. 73–82. In: Watson J.W. and Eyzaguirre P.B. (eds), Homegardens and in situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources in Farming Systems. Proc Second International Homegarden Workshop, 17–19 July 2001 Witzenhausen, Germany. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.
  84. Rao M.R., Palada M.C. and Becker B.N. 2004. Medicinal and aromatic plants in agroforestry systems (This volume). · DOI
  85. Rico-Gray V., Chemas A. and Mandujano S. 1991. Use of tropical deciduous forest species by the Yucatan Maya. Agroforest Syst 14: 149–161. · DOI
  86. Rico-Gray V., Garcia F.J.G., Chemas A., Puch A. and Sima P. 1990. Species composition, similarity, and structure of Mayan homegardens in Tixpeual and Tixcacaltuyub, Yucatan, Mexico. Econ Bot 44: 470–487. · DOI
  87. Roshetko M., Delaney M., Hairiah K. and Purnomosidhi P. 2002. Carbon stocks in Indonesian homegarden systems: Can small-holder systems be targeted for increased carbon storage? Amer J Altern Agric 17: 125–137. · DOI
  88. Rugalema G.H., O'Kting' Ati A., Johnsen F.H. 1994a. The homegarden agroforestry system of Bukoba district, North-Western Tanzania. Farming system analysis. Agroforest Syst 26: 53–64. · DOI · Paper page
  89. Rugalema G.H., Johnsen F.H., Rugambisa J. 1994b. The homegarden agroforestry system of Bukoba district, North-Western Tanzania. 2. Constraints to farm productivity. Agroforest Syst 26: 205–214. · DOI
  90. Rugalema G.H., Johnsen F.H., O'Kting' Ati A., Minjas A. 1995. The homegarden agroforestry system of Bukoba district, northwestern Tanzania. An economic appraisal of possible solutions to falling productivity. Agroforest Syst 28: 227–236. · DOI
  91. Ruthenberg H. 1980. Farming Systems in the Tropics (3rd ed.) Clarendon Press, Oxford, 424 pp.
  92. Shanavas A. and Kumar B.M. 2003 Fuelwood characteristics of tree species in the homegardens of Kerala, India. Agroforest Syst 58: 11–24. · DOI
  93. Shankar A.V., Gittelsohn J., Pradhan E.K., Dhungel C. and West K.P. Jr. 1998. Homegardening and access to animals in house-holds with xerophthalmic children in rural Nepal. Food Nut Bull 19: 34–41. · DOI
  94. Shujauddin N. and Kumar B.M. 2003. Ailanthus triphysa at different densities and fertilizer regimes in Kerala, India: Biomass productivity, nutrient export and nutrient use efficiency. Forest Ecol Manag 180: 135–151. · DOI
  95. Singh G.B. 1987. Agroforestry in the Indian subcontinent: past, present and future. pp. 117–138. In: Steppler H.A. and Nair P.K.R. (eds), Agroforestry: A Decade of Development, International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi.
  96. Soemarwoto O. 1987. Homegardens: A traditional agroforestry system with a promising future. pp. 157–170. In: Steppler H.A. and Nair P.K.R. (eds), Agroforestry: A Decade of Development, ICRAF, Nairobi.
  97. Soemarwoto O. and Conway G.R. 1991. The Javanese homegarden. J Farming Syst Res Extn 2: 95–118.
  98. Terra G.J.A. 1953. Mixed-garden horticulture in Java. Malayan J Trop Geogr 1: 33–43.
  99. Terra G.J.A. 1958. Farm systems in southeast Asia. Neth J Agric Sci 6: 157–182.
  100. Thaman R.R. 1990. Mixed homegardening in the Pacific Islands: present status and future prospects. pp. 41–65. In: Landauer K. and Brazil M. (eds), Tropical Homegardens, United Nations University Press, Tokyo.
  101. Vitousek P.M. and Reiners W.A. 1975. Ecosystems succession and nutrient retention: a hypothesis. BioScience 25: 376–381. · DOI
  102. Vogl C.R., Vogl-Lukraser B. and Caballero J. 2002. Homegardens of Maya Migrants in the district of Palenque, Chiapas, Mexcio: Implications for Sustainable Rural Development. pp. 1–12. In: Stepp J.R., Wyndham F.S. and Zarger R.K. (eds), Ethnobiology and Biocultural Diversity, University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA.
  103. Watson J.W. and Eyzaguirre P.B. (eds) 2002. Homegardens and in situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources in Farming Systems. Proc Second International Homegarden Workshop, 17–19 July 2001. Witzenhausen, Germany; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, 184 pp.
  104. Wezel A. and Bender S. 2003. Plant species diversity of home-gardens of Cuba and its significance for household food supply. Agroforest Syst 57: 37–47. · DOI · Paper page
  105. Whitten T., Soeriaatmadja R.E. and Afiff S.A. 1996. The Ecology of Java and Bali. The ecology of Indonesia series 2, Perplus Edition, Jakarta, 969 pp.
  106. Wichern F., Richter C. and Joergensen R.G. 2003. Soil fertility breakdown in a subtropical South African vertisol site used as a homegarden. Biol Fertil Soils 37: 288–294. · DOI
  107. Wickramasinghe A. 1996. The non forest wood fuel resources of Sri Lanka. Wood Energy News 11: 14–18.
  108. Wiersum K.F. 1982. Tree gardening and taungya on Java. Agroforest Syst 1: 53–70. · DOI
  109. Wiersum K.F. 2004. Forest Gardens as an 'Intermediate' Land-use System in the Nature-Culture Continuum: Characteristics and Future Potential (This volume). · DOI
  110. Yamada M. and Gholz H.L. 2002. An evaluation of agroforestry systems as a rural development option for the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforest Syst 55: 81–87. · DOI
  111. Yamamoto Y., Kubota N., Ogo T. and Priyono1991. Changes in the structure of homegardens under different climatic conditions in Java Island. Japanese J Trop Agric 35: 104–117.
  112. Zemede A. and Ayele N. 1995. Homegardens in Ethiopia: characteristics and plant diversity. Sinet (an Ethiopian J Sci) 18: 235–266.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, B. M., & Nair, P. K. R.
Affiliations
  • Kerala Agricultural University (IN)
  • University of Florida (US)
ORCID
Venue
Agroforestry Systems
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-07
Volume
61-62
Issue
1-3
Pages
135-152
ISSN
  • 0167-4366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9680
DOI
10.1023/b:agfo.0000028995.13227.ca
OpenAlex
W194466812
Cited by
615
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 30
FWCI
60.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Agroforestry Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › African Botany and Ecology Studies
Keywords
sustainability, nutrient cycling, biocultural diversity, product diversification, non-market values, gender equality, land fragmentation, agroecosystems, carbon sequestration, resource sharing, traditional knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review