How Long Have We Been in the Anthropocene Era?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scientific research on how complex systems are impacted by human technology and population growth has largely focused on threats to the natural world.
“Yet, scientific research on how complex systems are impacted by human technology and population growth has largely focused on the threats that these pose to the natural world”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 475
- Authors
- Crutzen, P. J., & Steffen, W.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (SE)
- ORCID
- Steffen, Will
- Venue
- Climatic Change
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 251-257
- ISSN
- 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1480
- OpenAlex
- W595759701
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Climatic Change (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
- Keywords
- Anthropocene, anthropogenic impacts, geological time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
