Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 37Gastrointestinal motility and disordersInfant Health and DevelopmentMicroscopic Colitis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Durability of the Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Based on Clinical Criteria

Adeniji, Olaitan A., Barnett, Cody B., Di Palma, Jack A.·2004·Digestive Diseases and Sciences
DOI 10.1023/b:ddas.0000026300.47363.3b
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Our purpose was to evaluate the durability of the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) based on clinical criteria. The study population consisted of a cohort of previously published study patients evaluated for IBS between 1989 and 1992, who met the International Congress of Gastroenterology criteria for IBS. Patients were reinterviewed for cardinal features of IBS, Rome I, Rome II, and Manning criteria 10-13 years after the initial diagnosis. During the observational follow-up period, there were 75 patients, 14 males and 61 females, with a mean age of 47.5 +/- 11.3 years (SD; range, 20 to 75 years). Mean time of reinterview after initial diagnosis was 11.8 +/- 0.9 years (range, 10 to 13 years). None of the 75 patients had an abdominal condition which could have been mistaken for IBS. Other abdominal conditions diagnosed during this period included diverticulitis (five), uterine fibromyoma (three), and gallbladder disease (three). Sixty-nine patients (92%) did not consider their symptoms as resolved. Thirty-five (46.7%) had repeat structural evaluation of the colon for similar symptoms without any new diagnoses made. Twenty-six (34.7%) and 32 (42.7%) presently meet the Rome II and Rome I criteria for IBS, respectively. Clinicians are advised to use clinical criteria for a specific and durable diagnosis of IBS.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:ddas.0000026300.47363.3b

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Drossman DA, Corazziari E, Talley NJ, et al.: Rome II: A multinational consensus document on functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gut 45 (Suppl II):1-81, 1999

Cited by

See all 37

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Adeniji, O. A., Barnett, C. B., & Di Palma, J. A.
Affiliations
University of South Alabama (US)
Venue
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-04
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
572-574
ISSN
  • 0163-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2568
DOI
10.1023/b:ddas.0000026300.47363.3b
OpenAlex
W2026809795
Cited by
37
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Digestive Diseases and Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Microscopic Colitis
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, Rome criteria, Manning criteria, long-term follow-up, symptom persistence, diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Biopsy, Needle, Constipation, Diarrhea, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Disease Progression, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.