Cited by 315scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Writing and PublishingAcademic Publishing and Open Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why do Some Countries Publish More Than Others? An International Comparison of Research Funding, English Proficiency and Publication Output in Highly Ranked General Medical Journals

Man, Jonathan P., Weinkauf, Justin G., Tsang, Monica, Sin, James Hogg Don D.·2004·European Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

National factor(s) influencing publication output in the highest ranked medical journals are largely unknown. We sought to examine the relationship between national research funding and English proficiency on publication output. We identified all original research articles appearing in the five highest ranked general medical journals between 1997 and 2001. Using the country of the corresponding author as the source nation for each article, we determined a standardized publication rate across developed nations. We used multiple regression techniques to determine the influence of national expenditures on research and scores from the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL), a surrogate for English proficiency, on publication output. There was a significant relationship of national spending on research and TOEFL scores to publication output of developed countries (p = 0.04; p < 0.01, respectively). These two variables explained approximately 71.5% of the variation in publication rate across developed nations around the world (R = 0.85; p < 0.01). Normalized for population size, English-speaking nations and certain northern European countries such as Denmark, The Netherlands, Switzerland, and Sweden had the highest rate of publication in the five highest ranked general medical journals, while Asian countries had generally low rates of publication. Research spending and English proficiency were strongly associated with publication output in the highest ranked general medical…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:ejep.0000036571.00320.b8

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. The Institute for Scientific Information Journal Citation Reports, 2000. Available at http://jcrcoeb.com. Accessed December 19, 2003.
  2. Quarterly labour force statistics 2000. No. 4. Paris, France: OECD, 2001.
  3. Organization For Economic Co-Operation and Development. OECD Science, Technology, Industry Scoreboard. Towards a Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris, France: OECD, 2001.
  4. TOEFL Test and score manual: 1997 Edition. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services, 1997.
  5. TOEFL: Test and score data summary 1997-1998 Edition. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services, 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–313 of 313

Metadata

Authors
Man, J. P., Weinkauf, J. G., Tsang, M., & Sin, J. H. D. D.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
European Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2004-08
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
811-817
ISSN
  • 0393-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7284
OpenAlex
W1969225797
Cited by
315
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
publication output, research funding, English proficiency, TOEFL scores, medical journals, cross-national comparison, research productivity
MeSH terms
Language, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Bibliometrics, Biomedical Research, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review