Cited by 17Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Predictors of Outcome Following Multidisciplinary Treatment of Chronic Pain: Effects of Changes in Perceived Disability and Depression

Lofland, Kenneth R., Burns, John W., Tsoutsouris, Joann, Laird, Maurine M., Blonsky, E. Richard, Hejna, William F.·1997·International Journal of Rehabilitation and Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:ijrh.0000008153.61553.60

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 17

Authors
Lofland, K. R., Burns, J. W., Tsoutsouris, J., Laird, M. M., Blonsky, E. R., & Hejna, W. F.
Venue
International Journal of Rehabilitation and Health
Published
1997-10
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
221-232
ISSN
  • 1068-9591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1537
OpenAlex
W2060954666
Cited by
17
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Rehabilitation and Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
chronic pain, multidisciplinary pain management, perceived disability, depression, cognitive behavioral therapy, pain intensity, functional level, treatment outcome predictors, therapeutic mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review