Cited by 136Evaluation and Performance AssessmentEducational Research and MethodsBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Nonconcurrent Multiple Baseline Designs and the Evaluation of Educational Systems

Harvey, Mark T., May, Michael E., Kennedy, Craig H.·2004·Journal of Behavioral Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:jobe.0000044735.51022.5d

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 136

Authors
Harvey, M. T., May, M. E., & Kennedy, C. H.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Craig H.
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Education
Published
2004-12
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
267-276
ISSN
  • 1053-0819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3513
OpenAlex
W1973502292
Cited by
136
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Behavioral Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
educational system evaluation, state education agencies, local education agencies, school practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review