Differential adhesion of normal and inflamed rat colonic mucosa by charged liposomes
Abstract
Purpose To study the adhesion properties of charged liposomes to the healthy and inflamed (colitis-induced) rat intestinal epithelium.Methods Neutral, positively charged, and negatively charged liposomes were prepared and tagged. The cationic or anionic liposomes contained increasing amounts (13, 22, or 36 mol%) of either the cationic lipid dimethyl-dioctadecylammoniumbromide (DODAB) or the anionic lipid 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-[phospho-rac-(1-glycerol)] (DSPG). Colitis was induced in rats by DNBS. Adhesion of the various types of liposomes was assessed in rat colon sacs. The effects of charge type, charge density (mol%), liposome size, and incubation time on the adhesion of the liposomes were compared in the inflamed and healthy epithelial tissues.Results Three times as many cationic liposomes adhered to the healthy colonic mucosa than neutral or anionic liposomes. However, anionic liposome adherence to the inflamed colonic mucosa was 2-fold that of either neutral or cationic liposomes (a finding that was verified by charged-dyes studies). Adherence was directly correlated with charge density. An inverse correlation was identified between cationic liposome size and healthy tissue adherence in short incubation periods. The adherence of cationic liposomes, which was also found to be time-dependent, decreased in healthy mucosa in the presence of high concentrations of aqueous Mg2+ rinse.Conclusions Anionic liposomes could be useful for the topical delivery of anti-inflammatory drugs in inflammatory bowel disease therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Positively charged nanocarriers are mucoadhesive, better interacting with epithelia, and enhance drug transport across biological barriers.
“On the other hand, positively charged nanocarriers are known for being mucoadhesive, better interacting with epithelia [68,69], and enhancing drug transport across biological barriers [39].”
From Polymeric micelles in drug delivery: An insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in biorelevant conditions (2021) · cites this paper as [68]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 164
- Authors
- Jubeh, T. T., Barenholz, Y., & Rubinstein, A.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Rubinstein, Abraham
- Venue
- Pharmaceutical Research
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 447-453
- ISSN
- 0724-8741 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-904X
- OpenAlex
- W2062726523
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Pharmaceutical Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- colonic mucosa, colitis, DODAB, liposome size, DNBS-induced colitis, topical drug delivery, anti-inflammatory drug delivery, inflammatory bowel disease, magnesium ions, rat colon
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cations, Colon, Intestinal Mucosa, Lipids, Liposomes, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review