Cited by 164Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsInflammatory Bowel DiseaseAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

Differential adhesion of normal and inflamed rat colonic mucosa by charged liposomes

Jubeh, Tareq Taha, Barenholz, Yechezkel, Rubinstein, Abraham·2004·Pharmaceutical Research

Abstract

Purpose To study the adhesion properties of charged liposomes to the healthy and inflamed (colitis-induced) rat intestinal epithelium.Methods Neutral, positively charged, and negatively charged liposomes were prepared and tagged. The cationic or anionic liposomes contained increasing amounts (13, 22, or 36 mol%) of either the cationic lipid dimethyl-dioctadecylammoniumbromide (DODAB) or the anionic lipid 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-[phospho-rac-(1-glycerol)] (DSPG). Colitis was induced in rats by DNBS. Adhesion of the various types of liposomes was assessed in rat colon sacs. The effects of charge type, charge density (mol%), liposome size, and incubation time on the adhesion of the liposomes were compared in the inflamed and healthy epithelial tissues.Results Three times as many cationic liposomes adhered to the healthy colonic mucosa than neutral or anionic liposomes. However, anionic liposome adherence to the inflamed colonic mucosa was 2-fold that of either neutral or cationic liposomes (a finding that was verified by charged-dyes studies). Adherence was directly correlated with charge density. An inverse correlation was identified between cationic liposome size and healthy tissue adherence in short incubation periods. The adherence of cationic liposomes, which was also found to be time-dependent, decreased in healthy mucosa in the presence of high concentrations of aqueous Mg2+ rinse.Conclusions Anionic liposomes could be useful for the topical delivery of anti-inflammatory drugs in inflammatory bowel disease therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:pham.0000019298.29561.cd

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 164

Authors
Jubeh, T. T., Barenholz, Y., & Rubinstein, A.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Rubinstein, Abraham
Venue
Pharmaceutical Research
Published
2004-03
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
447-453
ISSN
  • 0724-8741 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-904X
OpenAlex
W2062726523
Cited by
164
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmaceutical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Keywords
colonic mucosa, colitis, DODAB, liposome size, DNBS-induced colitis, topical drug delivery, anti-inflammatory drug delivery, inflammatory bowel disease, magnesium ions, rat colon
MeSH terms
Animals, Cations, Colon, Intestinal Mucosa, Lipids, Liposomes, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review