Cited by 122Social Movements and Cultural IdentityEmotional Labor in ProfessionsGender and Feminist Studies

Organizational “Emotion Work” Through Consciousness-Raising: An Analysis of a Feminist Organization

Reger, Jo·2004·Qualitative Sociology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:quas.0000020693.93609.6c

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 32 · Cited by 122

Authors
Reger, J.
Affiliations
Oakland University (US)
Corresponding author
Reger, Jo
Venue
Qualitative Sociology
Published
2004-06
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
205-222
ISSN
  • 0162-0436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7837
OpenAlex
W1977519834
Cited by
122
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Qualitative Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
emotional labor, consciousness raising, feminist organizations, National Organization for Women, social movements, emotions in organizations, anger, alienation, hopelessness, frustration, organizational processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review