Cited by 137Endometriosis Research and TreatmentHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealth Education and Validation

Development of the Short Form Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire: the EHP-5

Jones, Georgina, Jenkinson, Crispin, Kennedy, Stephen·2004·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Objective To develop and validate a short form version of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire which consists of a 30-item core questionnaire and a 23 item modular questionnaire. Methods Three studies were carried out to develop the Endometriosis Health Profile-5. Study 1: a short form version of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 core questionnaire was developed. Study 2: the results were verified in a new data set. Study 3: a short form version of the 23 item modular questionnaire was produced. The modular questionnaire contains six dimensions which may not be applicable to every woman with endometriosis and is used to supplement the five scales on the core questionnaire when required. Results The final instrument contained 11 items: five items from the core questionnaire and six items from the modular questionnaire. The 95% confidence intervals for Study 1 indicated that the scale scores overlapped with each item score and were confirmed in the second analysis (study 2). Each item was most highly correlated to its parent scale and less with the remaining four core questionnaire scales which was verified in study 2. In both studies all correlations were significant at the 0.01 level (two tailed test). Conclusion The Endometriosis Health Profile-5 is a reliable and valid short form questionnaire which can also be supplemented with a short form version of the modular questionnaire when required. It will be especially useful in clinical settings where a short and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:qure.0000021321.48041.0e

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 137

Authors
Jones, G., Jenkinson, C., & Kennedy, S.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Jones, Georgina
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2004-04
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
695-704
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2015901402
Cited by
137
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
endometriosis, short-form questionnaire, Endometriosis Health Profile-30, health status measurement, questionnaire development, psychometric validation, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Endometriosis, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sickness Impact Profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review