Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI): Development and validation of a patient reported assessment of severity of gastroparesis symptoms
Abstract
Background Patient-rated symptom assessments are needed for evaluating the effectiveness of medical treatments and for monitoring outcomes in gastroparesis. Objective This paper summarizes the development and psychometric evaluation of a new instrument, the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), for assessing severity of symptoms associated with gastroparesis. Methods The GCSI was based on reviews of the medical literature, patient focus groups, and interviews with clinicians. A sample of 169 patients with a documented diagnosis of gastroparesis participated in the psychometric evaluation study. Patients completed the GCSI, the SF-36 Health Survey, and disability days questions at baseline and after 8 weeks. A randomly selected sub-sample of 30 subjects returned at 2 weeks to assess test retest reliability. Clinicians rated severity of symptoms, and both clinicians and patients rated change in gastroparesis-related symptoms over the 8 week study. Results The GCSI is based on three subscales: post-prandial fullness/early satiety (4 items); nausea/vomiting (3 items), and bloating (2 items). Internal consistency reliability was 0.84 for the GCSI total score and ranged from 0.83 to 0.85 for the subscale scores. Two week test retest reliability was 0.76 for the total score and ranged from 0.68 to 0.81 for subscale scores. Construct validity was supported, given that we observed significant relationships between clinician assessed symptom severity and GCSI total score, signif…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) and the Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI‐SYM) provide validated, quantitative measures of gastroparetic symptoms and are useful for screening and monitoring treatment response in clinical practice and trials.
“The Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) and the Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders–Symptom Severity Index (PAGI‑SYM) provide validated, quantitative measures of gastroparetic symptoms and are useful for screening and monitoring treatment response in clinical practice and trials [62, 63].”
From Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices (2026) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 418
- Authors
- Revicki, D. A., Rentz, A. M., Dubois, D., Kahrilas, P., Stanghellini, V., Talley, N. J., & Tack, J.
- Affiliations
- Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Bologna (IT)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Revicki, Dennis A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Quality of Life Research
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 833-844
- ISSN
- 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2649
- OpenAlex
- W2054782808
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
- Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
- Keywords
- gastroparesis, Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index, patient-reported outcome measures, symptom severity assessment, postprandial fullness, early satiety, nausea and vomiting, bloating, psychometric validation, test-retest reliability, construct validity, responsiveness to change, disability days
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Disability Evaluation, Dyspepsia, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sampling Studies, Self-Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, United States, Treatment Outcome, Sickness Impact Profile, Gastroparesis, Internationality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review