Cited by 339Mercury impact and mitigation studiesHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityHuman Health and Disease

Influence of prenatal mercury exposure upon scholastic and psychological test performance: Benchmark analysis of a New Zealand cohort

Crump, Kenny S., Kjellström, Tord, Shipp, Annette M., Silvers, Abraham, Stewart, Alistair·1998·Risk Analysis

Abstract

This paper presents benchmark (BMD) calculations and additional regression analyses of data from a study in which scores from 26 scholastic and psychological tests administered to 237 6- and 7-year-old New Zealand children were correlated with the mercury concentration in their mothers' hair during pregnancy. The original analyses of five test scores found an association between high prenatal mercury exposure and decreased test performance, using category variables for mercury exposure. Our regression analyses, which utilized the actual hair mercury level, did not find significant associations between mercury and children's test scores. However, this finding was highly influenced by a single child whose mother's mercury hair level (86 mg/kg) was more than four times that of any other mother. When that child was omitted, results were more indicative of a mercury effect and scores on six tests were significantly associated with the mothers' hair mercury level. BMDs calculated from five tests ranged from 32 to 73 mg/kg hair mercury, and corresponding BMDLs (95% lower limits on BMDs) ranged from 17 to 24 mg/kg. When the child with the highest mercury level was omitted, BMDs ranged from 13 to 21 mg/kg, and corresponding BMDLs ranged from 7.4 to 10 mg/kg.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:rian.0000005917.52151.e6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cohort studies conducted in the Faroe Islands and New Zealand indicate that even in low doses, consumption of mercury-contaminated fish during pregnancy can cause important cognitive alterations in children.

    “The cohort studies conducted in the Faroe Islands and New Zealand indicate that even in low doses, the consumption of mercury-contaminated fish during pregnancy can cause important cognitive alterations in children [48,49].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crump, K. S., Kjellström, T., Shipp, A. M., Silvers, A., & Stewart, A.
Affiliations
  • Electric Power Research Institute (US)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
Risk Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-12
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
701-713
ISSN
0272-4332 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021768378
Cited by
339
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 23
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Risk Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Human Health and Disease
Keywords
prenatal mercury exposure, maternal hair mercury, benchmark dose, academic performance, psychological test scores, mercury neurotoxicity, outlier influence
MeSH terms
Achievement, Animals, Child, Female, Fishes, Food Contamination, Hair, Humans, Male, Mercury, New Zealand, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Psychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Risk Assessment, Benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review