The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is also a positive correlation between the citation frequency of publications and the number of co-authors of the work”
From What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008) · cites this paper as Beaver, 2004
Citations
Cites
What is research collaboration?
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00917-1 · Cited by 3,134
Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science
Hull, D. L. (1988) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226360492.001.0001 · Cited by 2,052
The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. L. (2005) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312705052359 · Cited by 1,668
Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems.
Lyon, A., & Ravetz, J. R. (1973) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2218013 · Cited by 842
Hull, D. L. (1988) · ETC.: A Review of General Semantics · doi:10.66774/etc_4604_292 · Cited by 667
Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future
Beaver, D. D. (2001) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1014254214337 · Cited by 548
Self-citationScientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers
Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. S. (1991) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02093973 · Cited by 453
Library and information science research
Bawden, D. (2005) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd.2005.27861bae.001 · Cited by 416
The scientific publication system in social science
Lindsey, D. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 247
The Epistemic Significance of Collaborative Research
Wray, K. B. (2002) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/338946 · Cited by 208
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Fox, M. F. (1991), Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science, In: Zuckerman, H. et al., (Eds), The Outer Circle, New York, W. W. Norton, pp. 188-204.
- Hughes, T. P. (1989), American Genesis, Penguin Books, New York.
- Leydesdorff, L. (2003), Measuring and modeling the knowledge base of innovations, Keynote Address, August 25, 2003, 9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Library of the Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–174 of 174
Pańczyk, M., Woynarowska-Sołdan, M., Belowska, J., Zarzeka, A., & Gotlib, J. (2015) · INTED proceedings · Cited by 5
Ahn, J., Choi, H., & Oh, D. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03138-4 · Cited by 4
Arhiliuc, C., & Guns, R. (2023) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04719-0 · Cited by 4
Determinants and Perceived Outcomes of Tourism Research Collaboration
Zehrer, A., & Benckendorff, P. J. (2013) · Tourism Analysis · doi:10.3727/108354213x13736372325830 · Cited by 4
Cross-time Analysis of Countries Co-authorship Networks in Library & Information Science Research
Hosseini, E., & Erfanmanesh, A. (2015) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 4
Mutschke, P. (2010) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-92029-0_20 · Cited by 4
Diener, E. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00018.x · Cited by 4
Polyphonic Analysis: obuchenie in qualitative research
Collet, V. S., & Ciminelli, M. R. (2017) · Qualitative Research Journal · doi:10.1108/qrj-08-2016-0053 · Cited by 4
International collaboration and knowledge creation: Evidence from economics in Portuguese academia
Sá, N., Ribeiro, A. P., & Carvalho, V. (2016) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scw014 · Cited by 4
Credit allocation for research institutes
Wang, J., Guo, Q., Yang, K., Han, J., & Liu, J.-G. (2017) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/118/48001 · Cited by 4
Applying Science Models for SearchPreprint
Mayr, P., Mutschke, P., Petras, V., Schaer, P., & Sure, Y. (2011) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1101.1639 · Cited by 4
A Study on the Citation Behavior by Academic Background of Researchers
Oh, Y., Oh, H.-J., Kim, C.-H., & Kim, Y. (2016) · Journal of the Korean Society for information Management · doi:10.3743/kosim.2016.33.1.247 · Cited by 3
Bibliometric analysis of the Adriatic-related oceanography and meteorology publications
Vilibi, I. (2009) · University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) · Cited by 3
Letina, S., Robins, G. L., & Seršić, D. M. (2016) · Revija za sociologiju · doi:10.5613/rzs.46.2.1 · Cited by 3
A Quantitative Analysis of Research Output of Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
Tripathi, M., & Kumar, S. (2015) · The International Information & Library Review · doi:10.1080/10572317.2015.1051908 · Cited by 3
Cheng, Z., Liu, X., Zou, Y., Zhang, W., & Zhou, J. (2026) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70455 · Cited by 2
Jaffe, A. B., & Jones, B. F. (2015) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226286860.003.0001 · Cited by 2
Les paradigmes de la revue Criminologie : auteurs, revues et disciplines qui ont marqué son histoire
Leclerc, C., Ream, F., Décary-Hêtu, D., Macaluso, B., & Larivière, V. (2018) · Criminologie · doi:10.7202/1045309ar · Cited by 2
Analysis of the Factors That Affect the Citability of Research Articles
Beskaravainaya, E. V., & Kharybina, T. N. (2020) · Scientific and Technical Information Processing · doi:10.3103/s0147688220020070 · Cited by 2
Trends in science and technology research: literature review
Khan, N. A., Jan, S., & Amin, I. (2013) · World Journal of Science Technology and Sustainable Development · doi:10.1108/wjstsd-04-2013-0021 · Cited by 2
Alonso‐Arroyo, A., de Oliveira, E. F.-T., Cabrini-Grácio, M. C., Dominique, A. P., & Aleixandre‐Benavent, R. (2016) · Investigación Bibliotecológica Archivonomía Bibliotecología e Información · doi:10.1016/j.ibbai.2016.10.022 · Cited by 2
Aulck, L. S., Vasan, K., & West, J. D. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.04093 · Cited by 3
Nagy, A. M. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3282318 · Cited by 2
Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900Preprint
Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., Tsou, A., & Gingras, Y. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1410.8544 · Cited by 2
Yabe, K., Takata, M., & Matsuura, K. (2026) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2025.101767 · Cited by 1
The Role of Institutional Context in Shaping Migrant Scientists’ New Research Collaborations
Paul, A. M., Hamid, Z., Kuehne, K. W., Sahakyan, M., & AlShebli, B. (2026) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-026-03340-9 · Cited by 1
United They’re Cited: Impact of a Social Work Coauthor Network
Woehle, R. (2016) · Advances in Social Work · doi:10.18060/18426 · Cited by 1
Distributions of Multiple Authors: A Case Study of two Journals (JASIST and Scientometrics)
Rao, I. K. R., & Sahoo, B. B. (2008) · Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management · doi:10.1080/09737766.2008.10700838 · Cited by 1
Who collaborates internationally in developing countries? The case of Colombia
Ordóñez–Matamoros, G., Cozzens, S. E., & García-Luque, M. (2009) · Cited by 1
Jeon, E., & Yi, C.-G. (2018) · Journal of Social Science · doi:10.16881/jss.2018.01.29.1.85 · Cited by 1
Pozitivist-Ampirik Araştırmalarda İnsan: Yanıltmacanın Dünü, Bugünü ve Yarını - 2
Yüksel, A. (2020) · Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi · doi:10.24010/soid.720112 · Cited by 1
Thompson, K. M., Garrison, K., Santelices-Werchez, C., Arellano-Rojas, P., & Reyes-Lillo, D. (2020) · e-Ciencias de la Información · doi:10.15517/eci.v10i2.39176 · Cited by 1
(2022) · Quality - Access to Success · doi:10.47750/qas/23.187.29 · Cited by 1
Song, G., Liu, L., Xi, J., & Cai, N. (2024) · Chinese Control Conference (CCC) · doi:10.23919/ccc63176.2024.10661656 · Cited by 1
How much the shared ocean or lake basins connect the researchers in neighbouring countries?
Vilibić, I. (2009) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0010-5 · Cited by 1
Kamata, T. (2018) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 1
Tréplica - Redes de Indivíduos e Redes de Instituições como Redes e, Claro, Organizações
Oliveira, C. C. G., & Lopes, H. E. G. (2014) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/1982-7849rac201410962
A co-authorship network analysis on mathematics education scholars
Kim, S. (2013) · The Mathematical Education · doi:10.63311/mathedu.2013.52.4.483
Collaboration makes an elite school? Empirical investigation into Korean Universities
Oh, D., Lee, J., & Ahn, J. (2013)
Methods for Extracting Meta-Information from
Databases, B. (2010)
COMENTÁRIO EDITORIAL A IMPORTÂNCIA DA COAUTORIA E A ESCOLHA DOS COAUTORES
Serra, F. A. R., & Ferreira, M. P. (2015) · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)
Structure, Change over Time, and Outcomes of Research Collaboration Networks: The Case of GRAND
Hayat, T. (2014) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Canadian Nanotechnology and Equity Challenges: Implications for Pro-Poor and Gender-Inclusive Policy
Ghiasi, G. (2018) · Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)
Создание научной репутации в цифровой век: опосредованный подход. Обзорная статья
ГЕРМАН, Э., Herman, E., НИКОЛАС, Д., & Nicholas, D. (2019) · Международный форум по информации · doi:10.36535/0203-6460-2019-03-1
Contemporary Academic Research and the Challenges of the Digital Era
Waterworth, P. (2020) · International Conference on Innovative Research Across Disciplines (ICIRAD) · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.200115.072
О факторах, влияющих на цитируемость научной статьи
Beskaravainaya, E. V., Beskaravainaja, E. V., & Kharybina, T. N. (2020) · Научно- техническая информация Серия 1 Организация и методика информационной работы · doi:10.36535/0548-0019-2020-05-4
ТОМПСОН, К. М., Thompson, K. M., ГАРРИСОН, К., Garrison, K., САНТЕЛИКЕС-ВЕРЧЕС, К., Santelices-Werchez, C., АРЕЛЬЯНО-РОХАС, П., Arellano-Rojas, P., РЕЕС-ЛИЛЬО, Д., & Reyes-Lillo, D. (2020) · Международный форум по информации · doi:10.36535/0203-6460-2020-03-1
(2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527681969.biblio
Measuring the Impact of Co-Author Count on Citation Count of Research Publications
Alharbi, W. M. H. (2022) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2022921935
Mapping the Borderline Personality Disorder: A Bibliometric Analysis
Gull, M., & Husain, A. (2022) · The New Educational Review · doi:10.15804/tner.2022.67.1.17
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.005.0001
Public Scientific Testimony II
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0007
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.002.0008
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0003
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0009
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0006
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0005
Scientific Justification as the Basis of Scientific Testimony
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0004
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.002.0006
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0001
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.002.0003
Testimony and the Scientific Enterprise
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0002
The Significance of Scentific Testimony
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0008
Gerken, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.002.0004
Культура цитирования: поведение цитирующих авторов vs доверие к результатам научных исследованийPreprint
Кириллова, О. В. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ux43m
Análise das coautorias da produção científica sobre museologia no GT 9 do ENANCIB
da Silva, K. L. N., Chaves, I. T., Garcia, J. C. R., & de Lima, I. F. (2023) · Informação & Informação · doi:10.5433/1981-8920.2022v27n3p179
Working with Practitioners in Operations ManagementPreprint
Si, H., Li, M., & Loch, C. H. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5140385
Choosing a career partner: birds of a feather flock together
Liu, J., Cui, Z., Huang, C., & Song, Y. (2025) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-025-05299-x
OM Forum–Working with Practitioners in Operations Management
Si, H., Li, M., & Loch, C. H. (2025) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2025.0147
Li, L., Divaker, R. D., & Fernandez, F. (2025) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-025-09592-0
Methods for Extracting Meta-Information from bibliographic databases
Biryukov, M. (2010) · Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg)
Metadata
- Authors
- Beaver, D. D.
- Affiliations
- Williams College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beaver, Donald deB.
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 399-408
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2153917061
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Williams College
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Keywords
- research collaboration, epistemic authority, citation analysis, citation history, scientific authority, sociology of science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review