Cited by 6Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support ResearchBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Pre-Post Effects of the Psychoeducational, Autism-Specific Parent Training FAUT-E

Medda, Juliane E., Kitzerow, Janina, Schlitt, Sabine, Berndt, Kerstin, Schwenck, Christina, Uhlmann, Lorenz, Freitag, Christine M.·2021·Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie

Abstract

Abstract. Objective: Psychoeducational parent training is an economic way to provide care for parents of children newly diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study explores pre-post effect sizes of the manualized autism-specific parent training FAUT-E (Frankfurter Autismus-Elterntraining). Method: Two behaviorally trained therapists worked with 6–10 parents in eight group sessions. Twenty-four parents of 24 children with ASD participated in the study. Outcomes were child- and parent-related measures obtained at T0 (first measurement), T1 (second measurement), T2 (postintervention), and T3 (3 months after intervention). Results: Children showed improved behavior in the parent-rated Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) total score after therapy ( p = .001; ES T1T2 = .73) and at T3 ( p = .018; ES T1-T3 = –.51), and a lower intensity of parent-rated problem behavior at T3 ( p = .031; ES T1–T3 = –.46). Parental measures did not change. Conclusions: This study found medium pre-post effects on the child’s behavior by FAUT-E between T1 and T2/T3; these were not observed between the measurements T0–T1. FAUT-E was easy to implement and did not increase parental stress. This is in line with results of studies on other training programs to teach parents to use effective behavioral strategies with ASD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1024/1422-4917/a000781

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 6

Authors
Medda, J. E., Kitzerow, J., Schlitt, S., Berndt, K., Schwenck, C., Uhlmann, L., & Freitag, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Published
2021-03-01
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
134-143
ISSN
  • 1422-4917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1664-2880
OpenAlex
W3119824278
Cited by
6
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, parent training, psychoeducational intervention, group intervention, behavioral problems, Aberrant Behavior Checklist, parental stress, behavioral strategies
MeSH terms
Problem Behavior, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Caregiver Burden, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child Rearing, Health Education, Humans, Parents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review