Cited by 106Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseInjury Epidemiology and Prevention

The changing gender ratio in occurrence of deliberate self-harm across the lifecycle

Hawton, Keith, Harriss, Louise·2008·Crisis

Abstract

Background Overall gender ratios are often quoted in studies of deliberate self-harm (DSH) patients, almost always with higher rates in females than males. Reporting a ratio across all ages may conceal important variations in the gender ratio across the life cycle. Method Analysis was done of the gender ratio by age groups in rates of DSH in a consecutive sample of DSH patients presenting to a general hospital over a 10-year period. The patients were identified through a well-established monitoring system. Results The study sample included 2,189 female and 1,439 male patients. While the overall gender rate ratio was 1.5 females to each male, the ratio varied considerably by age group: 8:1 in 10-14-year-olds, 3.1:1 in 15-19-year-olds, 1.6:1 in 20-24-year-olds, approximately 1.3:1 in 25-49-year-olds, and 0.8:1 in people aged 50 years and over. Conclusion Statements about overall gender ratios for DSH conceal important changes in the ratio across the life cycle. These changes probably reflect differences in development and problems faced in adolescence, changes in motivation for DSH with age, and the closer resemblance of DSH to suicide in older age groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/0227-5910.29.1.4

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This female majority reflects the typical pattern of self-harm in children and adolescents.

    “reflecting the typical pattern for SH in children and adolescents (Hawton 2008a).”

    From Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Hawton 2008a

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawton, K., & Harriss, L.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Venue
Crisis
Published
2008-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
4-10
ISSN
  • 0227-5910 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2396
OpenAlex
W2052754731
Cited by
106
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Crisis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Keywords
self-harm, sex ratio, life cycle, age differences, adolescents, young adults, older adults, suicide, hospital presentations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Prevalence, Self-Injurious Behavior, Sex Distribution, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review