Cited by 125Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesEthics in Clinical ResearchQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

The Ethics of Suicide Research: The Views of Ethics Committee Members

Lakeman, Richard, FitzGerald, Mary·2009·Crisis

Abstract

Background. Good quality, ethically sound research is needed in order to better understand, appropriately respond to, and reduce the incidence of suicide. There is, however, a lack of clarity around the nature of ethical problems associated with suicide research and how to resolve them. This is a formidable challenge for ethics committee members in approving and monitoring research. Aims. To describe the views that members of health research ethics committee hold regarding ethical problems and ethical practice in research involving people who are, or who have, been suicidal. Methods. Ethics committee members were invited to complete an online survey addressing the risks, benefits, and ethical problems associated with suicide research. Findings were aggregated into themes using an inductive form of content analysis. Results. Concerns of ethics committees centered on accessing the population, potential harm to participants or the researcher, researcher competency, maintaining confidentiality, providing support to participants, and responding sensitively to the needs of family. Conclusions. Ethical research involving suicidal people requires both procedures to protect participants, and consideration of ethics as an ongoing negotiated process. The findings of this research provide a snapshot of views held by a number of ethics committee members.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/0227-5910.30.1.13

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 125

Authors
Lakeman, R., & FitzGerald, M.
Affiliations
  • Dublin City University (IE)
  • James Cook University (AU)
Venue
Crisis
Published
2009-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
13-19
ISSN
  • 0227-5910 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2396
OpenAlex
W2118179678
Cited by
125
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Crisis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
suicide research, research ethics, ethics committees, research participant protection, confidentiality, harm to participants, family support, risk-benefit assessment
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Humans, Risk Assessment, Patient Selection, Ethics Committees, Research, Ethics, Research, Vulnerable Populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review